Odo vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
147 views|22 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Zscaler Logo
10,470 views|8,249 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Odo and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Odo vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable and without any issues at this moment.""The advanced protection, centralized administration, and the ability to have experts hand in hand providing us with good best practice solutions and centralized management have been useful.""Odo helped us a lot to be able to efficiently, effectively, and robustly have our employees who will work from their homes in times of the pandemic.""We have access to great functionality while establishing a remote connection."

More Odo Pros →

"Yes, it is very stable. I have never seen it go down, not once.""Users get direct secure access to applications over the internet.""The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are its ability to integrate with multiple IDPs and application segmentation.""The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions and it enables secure remote access for the users""I like its ease of use. It has a single pane of glass for the ZIA and ZPA pieces. It is very manageable. It is also very easy to deploy for secure access, and it gives half-decent coverage for visibility in terms of what the users use and what data is being proxied through the access gateway.""I like the web filtering capabilities.""The most valuable feature is its ability to establish connectivity for remote users and remote endpoints. It offers a high level of granularity compared to typical VPNs, which also encapsulate a lot of I/O.""The VPN is great for the stability on offer and for the cloud updates and insights you can get."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pros →

Cons
"Scalability is very limited.""They should centralize the configuration interfaces into a single pane since sometimes a point is being configured, and you have to move to another point to finish the configuration.""We'd like this simplified to provide a prompt and efficient installation since, in many cases, the solution or the guides provided by the manufacturer are a bit complex.""Until now, I have not found anything that I do not like about this service, however, security trends and vulnerabilities will always exist and there should always be new ways to protect the perimeters of our corporate infrastructure."

More Odo Cons →

"We faced certain migration and implementation challenges in executing the tasks, so I would suggest improvement related to the stability of the solution.""The interface needs a bit of work.""Users report application access or latency issues with Zscaler Private Access.""Setup is a bit complex because there are many steps that need to be taken before onboarding and activating the solution.""There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long.""It has a limitation, if you are creating a rule or something for a web application or something, you could only add five users, not more than that. Five or four users are only included in a rule. If you want to create a rule for more than five or four users, you have to go through other methods, not particularly with the application. Working within the application with this method would be quite easy as compared to listing a URL or a normal IP address.""An area for improvement would be the ease of configuration.""We often face performance and latency issues with Zscaler SASE."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."
  • "The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."
  • "The price is competitive."
  • "In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."
  • "Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."
  • More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The advanced protection, centralized administration, and the ability to have experts hand in hand providing us with good best practice solutions and centralized management have been useful.
    Top Answer:Regarding the cost, it is considerable. That said, it is a good investment, and the installation is very easy to carry out.
    Top Answer:Scalability is very limited. It cannot be adapted to all companies, and the need for more and more equipment makes it hard to scale. It is important to understand that we need greater flexibility when… more »
    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.
    Top Answer:Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific… more »
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    147
    Comparisons
    22
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    7.5
    1st
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    10,470
    Comparisons
    8,249
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    403
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Zscaler SASE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point provides organizations of all sizes with the latest data and network security protection in an integrated next generation firewall platform, reducing complexity and lowering the total cost of ownership. Whether you need next-generation security for your data center, enterprise, small business or home office, Check Point has a solution for you.

    The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enables fast, secure connections and allows your employees to work from anywhere using the internet as the corporate network. Based on the zero trust principle of least-privileged access, it provides comprehensive security using context-based identity and policy enforcement.

    The Zero Trust Exchange operates across 150 data centers worldwide, ensuring that the service is close to your users, co-located with the cloud providers and applications they are accessing, such as Microsoft 365 and AWS. It guarantees the shortest path between your users and their destinations, providing comprehensive security and an amazing user experience.

    Sample Customers
    Daymark, Datastream
    Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Odo vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Odo vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Odo is ranked 17th in ZTNA as a Service with 4 reviews while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. Odo is rated 8.0, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Odo writes "Easy to use and manage and straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Odo is most compared with , whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cloudflare Access and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. See our Odo vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange report.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.