We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Now it is easier to set up the development environment and also to test the applications on the pipelines."
"This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing."
"When you have Kubernetes, you can use Mirantis Container Cloud to manage your Kubernetes for easy access and security. It also helps you to manage your CI/CD system. It helps you to build a container-oriented developer workflow. So, if you're building an application in Kubernetes, it provides you with a Kubernetes engine."
"It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future."
"The UI is very useful."
"The time that we require to makes changes has been reduced from weeks to days."
"This has helped us to better clean up and audit changes to the firewall policy."
"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies. This makes it a lot easier to find out the things that are wrong."
"The product streamlines our change management process."
"The designer gives the ability to know where to add a rule, or if the rule is already in place."
"The stability is bulletproof."
"Tufin is our audit trail for all changes. We have to be PCI compliant, and it's the tool we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side."
"The reports that this solution provides are very useful."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"When it comes to the integration part, it's the basic functionality, but for any product, at the end of the day, security is extremely relevant. I personally feel like you have to constantly strive towards being more secure. You can never be 100% secure, and you have to work more toward security. It's as simple as that."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"It would be very nice to have a GUI that can be used by any administrator, and not just people who have experience with Docker."
"Sometimes the basic support is a bit difficult if you have a firewall and cloud servers behind the firewall and then try to implement the backup solution, it is a bit difficult to do by yourself."
"There could be an automation feature included in the product. It will speed up application processes and will not require scripting codes."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"This solution is open-source and they need to focus on improving the Linux Operating Systems' GUI. It does not have a GUI making it not user-friendly. Additionally, the containers need to improve security and compliance."
"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."
"I would like more enforcement. Right now. it's a lot of alerting. You see it in Tufin, but you have to go to Check Point or whatever device to make the actual action."
"The documentation site is horrible as well. It has a tree structure, and you really get lost quite easily."
"Our initial setup was complex from two dimensions, because we were deploying it globally and had to have a centralized view, but a distributed approach. We had it in Asia and North America, causing a slightly complicated approach."
"I would like to see more configuration options on next-generation firewalls, defining possible standards for devices."
"The hardest piece is getting the matrix built."
"Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin."
"The solution does not have automation with other Firewalls."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 22nd in Container Security with 180 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
