We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Mirantis Container Cloud operates similarly to how we interact with databases. It provides a comprehensive platform for deploying and managing containerized applications across cloud environments."
"Very easy solution to use as it is intuitive."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The solution containerizes software."
"The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing."
"Now it is easier to set up the development environment and also to test the applications on the pipelines."
"The most valuable function is the SecureChange where it is able to automate everything from the validation of the rules to the pushing of the rules."
"We've scaled it to hundreds of firewalls."
"Our engineers are spending less time on manual processes, specifically for the reporting functionality. For doing the rule cleanup and policy analysis, it would be a nightmare to do that manually. So, it is saving our engineering teams time from not having to do manual log reviews."
"It is very easy to use. We can get results back quickly."
"The most valuable feature of Tufin is we have better visibility and management of our file infrastructure."
"The reports that this solution provides are very useful."
"We find it to be flexible. If we have a change that needs to be done, it will go ahead and do it for all our devices, regardless of the manufacturer that we have associated with it."
"It is an important application for controlling and monitoring firewall rules. It is useful for making and monitoring the changes."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"This product will only be useful if it can successfully run legacy applications in the cloud."
"The solution's stability could be improved."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"An improvement would be automated testing."
"The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial."
"The GUI needs more visibility in terms of licensing because it is hard to tell which products and licensed and which are not."
"It would be better if they modernized the web GUI. The web interface GUI is simple and not complicated, but it's also too old."
"The initial setup of Tufin was complex. We had some issues with the architecture."
"A limitation right now for compressed firewalls is the limited ability to see above a site level in terms of the Topology Mapping in the policy display. While Tufin's actively working on a solution, or at least they have this in the queue, from being able to view this on a higher level and how all of our site networks are connected, this ability would be useful, as we expect to have these compressed firewalls in place for quite some time."
"The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a function that one person can analyze it. It requires multiple people to analyze the data."
"Currently, we have to get different data from different sections of the site. It would be nice if it was all combined into one."
"They need to offer more support to vendors, such as Cisco, Checkpoint, Fortinet, and Forcepoint."
"I would like more enforcement. Right now. it's a lot of alerting. You see it in Tufin, but you have to go to Check Point or whatever device to make the actual action."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 15th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 23rd in Container Security with 180 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
