We performed a comparison between Microsoft Virtual Server and Numecent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."It has proven to be most effective for workloads associated with running web portals."
"It is easy to use. It offers good compatibility with other operating systems. That's one of the reasons I used it."
"The performance and scalability offered by the tool meet our company's expectations."
"The product provides flexibility."
"It is a scalable solution...I followed some online tutorials, because of which I did not face any technical issues or the need to contact the solution's technical support."
"Microsoft Virtual Server is stable."
"The tool is perfectly stable."
"The product is reliable."
"Driver virtualisation"
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Microsoft Virtual Server needs to improve its patching. It should offer us a review before updates. The solution should also improve its pricing."
"In the future release, I would like to see more automation. Moreover, improvements related to recovery could be beneficial."
"The platform’s dashboard features could be better."
"The response time from technical support could be faster."
"The pricing and scalability are areas of the product with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Microsoft Virtual Server's cost was an area of concern...I feel Microsoft Virtual Server will be stopped in a couple of months or a couple of years, and it will be completely replaced with SQL Server data warehouse and Microsoft Fabric."
"The solution's user interface could be improved."
"Self-service Portal."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Virtual Server is ranked 3rd in Application Virtualization with 33 reviews while Numecent is ranked 6th in Application Virtualization. Microsoft Virtual Server is rated 8.2, while Numecent is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Virtual Server writes "Easy to use but challenges with desktop version and lags ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Numecent writes "Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions". Microsoft Virtual Server is most compared with , whereas Numecent is most compared with Microsoft App-V, VMware ThinApp and Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service).
See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
