We performed a comparison between Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management and VMware Service Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."It is a scalable product."
"We have installed a physical server for failover. We need to configure cluster on everything. But with VMware, we do not need to cluster. We get automatically seven physical nodes failover. If one fails we have no issues."
"It provides us with improved maintenance cycles."
"All of the features are very suitable for us. It is also a stable solution."
"The product’s stability needs improvement."
"It needs to improve user roles and access rights."
"Not a ten because the price is high."
"Its automation feature needs improvement. They can include the vRealize Automation feature in this solution."
More Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management is ranked 19th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while VMware Service Manager is ranked 23rd in IT Asset Management. Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management is rated 7.0, while VMware Service Manager is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management writes "Has an easy initial setup process, but its stability needs improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Service Manager writes "It needs to improve user roles and access rights. It provides us with improved maintenance cycles". Micro Focus ZENworks Asset Management is most compared with ServiceNow, whereas VMware Service Manager is most compared with .
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.