We performed a comparison between Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] and vCenter Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."This product can be customized according to the needs of any company."
"It is stable and scalable."
"We have now automatic and immediate control of assets usage, and we can now better manage our assets pool and get benefits through that."
"vCenter has some good user experience, and the initial setup is straightforward."
"The technical support services are good."
"We can scale the solution as needed."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the virtual machine management across different hosts, located in different areas."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"Beneficial patch management and template features."
"This is the best solution for management for the server administrator. VMware has been on the market for many years, so they have a lot of solutions. For on-premises, VMware is the best available solution."
"My experience managing virtual environments using vCenter Configuration Manager has been quite smooth. Over time, I've observed that there's been a significant local competency built around the product, especially in India, where ESXi and VMware dominate the market. It's evident that vCenter Configuration Center is the preferred management tool in this context, and it's relatively easy to find expertise in the market."
"The technology used is outdated, the interface is outdated, the database is outdated, everything is outdated."
"The usability of this product is still out-of-date and could be improved. The interface could be improved."
"There are a lot of things that need improvement. Software recognition, software licensing, software compliance, data inputs, reporting, and support are some of the areas."
"It is not so user-friendly that you can just start the host and everything works."
"It should be easier to use alternate storage."
"Acquiring certifications often require extensive training and successfully passing an exam, which can be costly and time-consuming, particularly if you already possess experience in the domain. As a result, this can increase the overall cost of obtaining certification and may present a challenge that requires addressing."
"SAP CRM could improve by adding additional automation features."
"vCenter Configuration Manager could improve by having more integration."
"The Self Service Interface is not very good and it needs improvement."
"It lacks the capability to manage the other systems."
"Users need to pay a licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."
More Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More vCenter Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Asset Management while vCenter Configuration Manager is ranked 9th in Configuration Management with 50 reviews. Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while vCenter Configuration Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] writes "A stable and clever solution, but it is very complex and it needs a lot of improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Configuration Manager writes "A solution with a range of functionalities and several pricing plans that suit your needs". Micro Focus Asset Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas vCenter Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Satellite and BigFix.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.