ThreatLocker Protect vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
macmon secure Logo
3,616 views|884 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ThreatLocker Logo
89 views|69 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between macmon Network Access Control and ThreatLocker Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed ThreatLocker Protect vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to.""The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me.""The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

More macmon Network Access Control Pros →

"The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds.""The great thing is that if you get a malicious email and you try to run something, ThreatLocker is not going to let it do anything. It is not going to let anything infect your network.""Every single feature has been invaluable.""The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.""Application control, ring-fencing, and storage control are the most important features, followed closely by elevation.""The biggest improvement has been knowing that something unauthorized isn't going to get installed on anyone’s machines.""We use ThreatLocker's Allowlisting to whitelist specific applications and prevent unauthorized software from running.""The sandbox functionality is fantastic."

More ThreatLocker Protect Pros →

Cons
"The service macmon offers is already great.""The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates.""The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

More macmon Network Access Control Cons →

"Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming.""The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself.""The reporting could be improved.""The portal can be a little overwhelming at times from an administration point of view. It displays a lot of information, and it's all useful. However, sometimes there is too much on the screen to sift through, especially if you're trying to diagnose a client's problem with a piece of software. Maybe something has stopped working since they updated it, and we need to see if ThreatLocker is blocking a component of that software.""ThreatLocker Allowlisting needs to improve its user interface and overall workflow.""From a reporting perspective, enhancing the ability to customize reports would be beneficial.""We identified several areas that we would like to see improved.""More visibility in the built-ins would be nice."

More ThreatLocker Protect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Others say ThreatLocker is too expensive, and I tell them they're dreaming. It's well-priced for what it does."
  • "Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."
  • "The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."
  • "The pricing works fine for me. It's very reasonably priced."
  • "The pricing is fair and there is no hard sell."
  • "The price of ThreatLocker Allowlisting is reasonable in the market, but it is not fantastic."
  • "I find ThreatLocker's pricing to be reasonable for the services it provides."
  • "I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."
  • More ThreatLocker Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me.
    Top Answer:There is no information on the protocol where the clients stop to authenticate. There are some policies, but I don't know whether the device stopped on the authentication or authorization levels. I… more »
    Top Answer:The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
    Top Answer:ThreatLocker's pricing seems justifiable. We get a lot of value for what we pay, with excellent support, the program itself, and everything related to it being top-notch. If my CTO ever suggested… more »
    Top Answer:The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,616
    Comparisons
    884
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    613
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    89
    Comparisons
    69
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    1,919
    Rating
    9.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    macmon NAC
    ThreatLocker Allowlisting, ThreatLocker Network Control, ThreatLocker Ringfencing
    Learn More
    Overview

    With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

    UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation. 

    To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

    Find out more:
    - macmon NAC Bundles
    - macmon NAC features

    The ThreatLocker platform is a robust Zero Trust endpoint security solution, safeguarding organizations against ransomware, malware, and various cyber threats through a unified approach. It incorporates key features like Application Allowlisting, Ringfencing, and Dynamic Network Control. Application Allowlisting ensures that only authorized applications run on endpoints, preventing unauthorized software and thwarting ransomware and malware threats. Ringfencing isolates approved applications from one another and the operating system, inhibiting malware spread and unauthorized access to sensitive data. Dynamic Network Control regulates traffic, enhancing security by closing unused ports and opening them as needed for authorized connections. The ThreatLocker platform simplifies security management with a centralized console and supports Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints. 

    Sample Customers
    More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Retailer6%
    Government6%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business93%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise31%
    Buyer's Guide
    ThreatLocker Protect vs. macmon Network Access Control
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatLocker Protect vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while ThreatLocker Protect is ranked 6th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 13 reviews. macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6, while ThreatLocker Protect is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatLocker Protect writes "Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online". macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform, whereas ThreatLocker Protect is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress and GravityZone Business Security. See our ThreatLocker Protect vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

    See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.