IronNet Collective Defense Platform vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IronNet Logo
671 views|208 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Rapid7 Logo
2,672 views|1,550 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IronNet Collective Defense Platform and Rapid7 Metasploit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA).
To learn more, read our detailed Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use and the full reach of services."

More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Pros →

"The Search Engineering feature is good.""The solution is open source and has many small targetted penetration tests that have been written by many people that are useful. You can choose different subjects for the test, such as Oracle databases or Apache servers.""Rapid7 Metasploit is a useful product.""The reporting on the solution is good.""I don't have any other tools like it, and I always use it when I'm doing a pen test. Metasploit is a great solution for penetration testing,""The greatest advantage of Rapid7 Metasploit is that it is the only system that can directly exploit vulnerabilities on the Metasploit platform.""It's not possible to do penetration testing without being very proficient in Metasploit.""It contains almost all the available exploits and payloads."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see it integrate with third-party systems."

More IronNet Collective Defense Platform Cons →

"It is necessary to add some training materials and a tutorial for beginners.""Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.""The solution is not user-friendly and has room for improvement.""The open-source version has reporting limitations. You need to develop these capabilities yourself. Built-in reporting is an excellent feature for penetration testing, but it isn't a must-have. The solution could also cover more vulnerabilities. Metasploit has around 10,000 exploits in its library, but more is always better.""Metasploit cannot be installed on a machine with an antivirus.""Rapid7 Metasploit can add a GUI feature because it is only available online.""At the time I was using it, the graphical user interface needed some improvements.""Better automation capabilities would be an improvement."

More Rapid7 Metasploit Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I use the open-source version of this product. Pricing is not relevant."
  • "It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."
  • "The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."
  • "There are two versions available, one of which is the Pro version, and the other is the free version."
  • "Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."
  • "The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."
  • "We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Rapid7 Metasploit Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.
    Top Answer:Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn.
    Ranking
    Views
    671
    Comparisons
    208
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    12th
    Views
    2,672
    Comparisons
    1,550
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IronDefense, Iron Dome, Cyber Operations Center
    Metasploit
    Learn More
    Overview

    When organizations collaborate to detect, share intelligence, and stop threats together in real time, they form a Collective Defense community. Discover how IronNet's Collective Defense platform – built on our IronDome and IronDefense products – enables organizations to realize the full benefits of this approach.

    The IronNet Collective Defense Platform leverages advanced AI-driven Network Detection and Response (NDR) capabilities to detect and prioritize anomalous activity inside individual enterprise network environments. The platform analyzes threat detections across the community to identify broad attack patterns and provides anonymized intelligence back to all community members in real time, giving all members early insight into potential incoming attacks. See Collective Defense in action.

    Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

    Sample Customers
    Thomson Reuters
    City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Government8%
    University6%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Integrator9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IronNet Collective Defense Platform is ranked 16th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while Rapid7 Metasploit is ranked 12th in Vulnerability Management with 18 reviews. IronNet Collective Defense Platform is rated 0.0, while Rapid7 Metasploit is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IronNet Collective Defense Platform writes "Easy to use, stable, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 Metasploit writes "Helps find vulnerabilities in a system to determine whether the system needs to be upgraded". IronNet Collective Defense Platform is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(x), whereas Rapid7 Metasploit is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Pentera, Rapid7 InsightVM, Acunetix and Nucleus.

    We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.