Informatica Persistent Data Masking vs VMware Tanzu GemFire comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Informatica Persistent Data Masking and VMware Tanzu GemFire based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Masking Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is data discovery. This is the most exciting feature for all of the banks.""Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.""Informatica provides a comprehensive solution for on-the-fly or real-time data masking.""The most valuable features are the structure masking and platform masking.""Informatica is user-friendly, stable, and scalable. These three aspects are the most valuable for us. If we can make it work well with the CRM, we can continue or try again this year to complete that part of the project. I am confident that this kind of solution is what we need because we have a third-party resource that works in the development."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Pros →

"The solution improved our site reliability."

More VMware Tanzu GemFire Pros →

Cons
"I have encountered some issues using the substitution, which is one of the techniques of data masking.""The data discovery isn't that good yet for Salesforce. We have another tool that we use for this. It may be a problem because Salesforce on the cloud.""Once the data is masked, we won't be able to reverse it back to its original value.""Informatica should simplify the rules for setting classifications and user access management permissions. It's too complex to define, configure, and make work.""Informatica's support understands the solution, but they lack the experience we need for our use case. That was one thing that we prioritized when we started searching for this kind of solution."

More Informatica Persistent Data Masking Cons →

"The initial deployment was a little difficult."

More VMware Tanzu GemFire Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Informatica Persistent Data Masking can mask production data for different users, ensuring that only authorized individuals can access sensitive information.
Top Answer:I think there's only one area that could be improved. Currently, when we apply the Data Masking rate, we don't have a way to view the masked data. It would be helpful if there was a feature to allow… more »
Top Answer:Test data management is a common use case. When conducting testing in lower environments, we want to avoid exposing sensitive information. To achieve this, we use Data Masking to modify the data. For… more »
Top Answer:The solution improved our site reliability.
Top Answer:The price is pretty good. It is a CPU-based system. The price depends on how big our cluster is.
Top Answer:When we had outages, we had timeouts. Sometimes, the nodes would drop out of a cluster. Therefore, the applications would get timeouts. There is a newer version out that we're planning to upgrade to… more »
Ranking
10th
out of 31 in Data Masking
Views
299
Comparisons
175
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
442
Comparisons
273
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
330
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Data Masking, Informatica Data Masking
GemFire, Pivotal GemFire
Learn More
Overview

De-identify, de-sensitize, and anonymize sensitive data from unauthorized access for application users, business intelligence, application testing, and outsourcing.

An in-memory data grid powered by Apache Geode
Scale your data services on demand to support high-performance, real-time apps.

Sample Customers
Vale, Hot Telecommunication, UPMC
Southwest Airlines, Indian Railways, GE Power and Water
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm23%
Computer Software Company13%
Educational Organization6%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Computer Software Company17%
Insurance Company8%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise70%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise64%
Buyer's Guide
Data Masking
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, Broadcom, DATPROF and others in Data Masking. Updated: April 2024.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica Persistent Data Masking is ranked 10th in Data Masking with 5 reviews while VMware Tanzu GemFire is ranked 19th in Database Development and Management with 2 reviews. Informatica Persistent Data Masking is rated 7.8, while VMware Tanzu GemFire is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Persistent Data Masking writes "Enables secure data protection during testing and controlled access to sensitive information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu GemFire writes "The product improves site reliability, but it is not stable, and the initial deployment was a little difficult". Informatica Persistent Data Masking is most compared with Delphix, IBM InfoSphere Optim, Protegrity Data Security, IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas VMware Tanzu GemFire is most compared with Nutanix Database Service and VMware Postgres.

We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.