IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager vs Sonatype Nexus Repository comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager to be scalable."

More IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager Pros →

"It has very good enterprise integration, so we are able to integrate it with the rest of our infrastructure for authentication, for role management. That is very useful.""Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In this regard, Nexus Repository Manager 3 stands out for its comprehensive coverage, accommodating a vast array of packages widely utilized across the globe. This inclusivity enables easy access to a diverse range of packages, making it a pivotal aspect of its functionality.""I have found managing the artifact features very useful.""One of the most valuable features is the variety of permissions you can use on the repository. That helps us protect access to the information inside of the repository.""While there aren't many features, they're all useful, particularly the ability to store and retrieve content, and to proxy all of the features that an enterprise repository manager should have.""The most valuables features of the Sonatype Nexus Repository are you can block any uploads that you do not want. For example, from Maven. Even though someone will try to create a pump file with a package not currently in our repository, they can go and get it, but it won't store it into the Sonatype Nexus Repository and therefore won't be propagated across the enterprise.""The searching capability is good... and we are managing multiple central repositories.""The customer service and support are good ."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository Pros →

Cons
"The user interface of IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager could improve. You have to know the full UI before you can manage it properly."

More IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager Cons →

"Lacks an end-to-end solution for developers to sign and store an image.""[A] main feature that is missing in Nexus IQ is the ability to explore the history of the different reports that have been generated for a given product. For the time being, in the Nexus IQ UI, we are only able to browse the latest reports that have been generated for a given product. It would be really useful for us to be able to go back in time by browsing through the reports and to have a tool that would give us the evolution of the metrics.""Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently, the grouping functionality is not robust, particularly for Docker images within a group. The support for this aspect seems to be contingent on the license type. For instance, with the Voss license type, there is a noticeable absence of support for this feature. This is an area that could benefit from enhancement in the upcoming updates.""When it comes to uploading NPM libraries, JavaScript dependencies libraries, it is a little bit of a convoluted process. They need to improve uploading libraries for NPM-type repositories.""They should have the ability to support multiple data centers. That is actual scalability and, in effect, high-availability.""If your emphasis shifts towards NPM products or NuGet, using Nexus is still feasible but may require more effort. The tool is more centered around Maven, making it a bit challenging to seamlessly integrate with NPM.""We've had some challenges around the database they use. We've had some big outages and it's due to the fact that we haven't found the database they use is all that stable... We've had some really positive conversations with Sonatype around that and they've provided us with the support and special services to help us migrate off of that, on to another type of database platform which we have more control over.""We had some issues with the container platform, but we raised a support ticket and it was sorted out for us."

More Sonatype Nexus Repository Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "In my opinion, the pricing is very fair and very customer-oriented. It's much better than any other tool I have used so far."
  • "It seems like a fair price, based on other software solutions I've purchased."
  • "It's quite expensive. They are charging around $110 or $120 per user, per year. It's quite expensive in comparison to the other tools available in the market."
  • "Nexus Repository Manager Pro is quite affordable because it's about €100, per user, per year. Purchasing licenses was not really a big issue for us. Regarding Nexus IQ, it's much more expensive. We purchased 250 licenses and they cost us about €120,000."
  • "One of the challenges we had around licensing was how to deal with anonymous requests. According to the letter of the contract, an anonymous request consumes a license. We had to do some work to get over the fact that any anonymous interactions with the Repository product had to be put back to an end-user account."
  • "There were costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. The standard is free."
  • "The cost is managed by the client."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost."
  • More Sonatype Nexus Repository Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Distribution solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have found IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager to be scalable.
    Top Answer:The user interface of IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager could improve. You have to know the full UI before you can manage it properly.
    Top Answer:IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager is used for complete database storage.
    Top Answer:Primarily, the extensive support for a wide range of packages is a crucial factor. The effectiveness of new-age package managers is often determined by the breadth of packages they can handle. In this… more »
    Top Answer:I use the open-source version of the product, which is free of cost.
    Top Answer:Particularly concerning OSF-type licenses, while they support a multitude of features, there's room for improvement in the single point transform, especially for grouping. It appears that currently… more »
    Ranking
    6th
    Views
    48
    Comparisons
    31
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    194
    Rating
    8.0
    1st
    Views
    363
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tivoli Configuration Manager
    Nexus Repository, Nexus Repository Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager V4.2 provides software distribution and hardware and software inventory capability in a multiplatform environment. Tivoli Configuration Manager V4.2 can help enable you to: Scan hardware and software to determine which enterprise assets are part of your inventory, Reduce the time and effort in installing and configuring your network population by centralizing and automating the distribution of software across your enterprise, Automate and schedule software distribution and inventory operations, Monitor system and configuration changes, Manage the desired state of all elements of your network, Manage your enterprise environments across firewalls and Extend the scope of your managed network to include pervasive devices, such as personal digital assistants (PDAs).
    Nexus Repository is powered by Repository Manager, the same technology engine found in our OSS version deployed at more than 100,000 organziations world-wide. It is Built on the shoulders of Maven, Repository Manager supports all popular component formats and brings your entire development organization together. It includes staging and release functionality that provides support for operations and quality assurance processes prior to production and gives you instant insight into potential component security, license, and quality issues, enabling teams to take corrective action early and quickly.
    Sample Customers
    Bendigo Community Telco
    Goldman Sachs, Toyota, Disney, Deutsche Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government11%
    Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%

    IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager is ranked 6th in Software Distribution with 1 review while Sonatype Nexus Repository is ranked 1st in Software Distribution with 15 reviews. IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager is rated 8.0, while Sonatype Nexus Repository is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager writes "Responsive support, reliable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Repository writes "Vastly improved our whole release cycle; automated processes help to deliver code". IBM Tivoli Configuration Manager is most compared with , whereas Sonatype Nexus Repository is most compared with JFrog Artifactory, Archiva, Bitbucket Data Center, Inedo ProGet and EMCO Remote Installer.

    See our list of best Software Distribution vendors.

    We monitor all Software Distribution reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.