We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."
"Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites."
"SAML 2.0."
"The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for."
"The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy."
"I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"We can access our sign-ins and passwords on up to five devices per user. This means I can access a given site and my login and password for that site from my home and office computers as well as my phone and iPad."
"Enables IT department to force very complex passwords for certain users."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"Chrome extension and app."
"Keeper was user-friendly."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve."
"An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help."
"Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs."
"The self-service portal needs improvement."
"The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"The user experience and the mobile app could be improved."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"The technical support has no experience."
More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
