• Home
  • IBM QualityStage vs. Informatica Cloud Data Quality

IBM QualityStage vs Informatica Cloud Data Quality comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM QualityStage

Read 4 IBM QualityStage reviews
208 views|142 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Informatica Logo

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

Read 8 Informatica Cloud Data Quality reviews
1,647 views|1,124 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Data Quality
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM QualityStage and Informatica Cloud Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Quality Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Has allowed my teams of developers to transfer data quickly and easily from SQL databases into Oracle databases.
This application has allowed my teams of developers to transfer data quickly and easily from SQL databases into Oracle databases. The application... Read more →
Avra Jyoti Ghosh
Researched IBM QualityStage but chose Informatica Cloud Data Quality: Reliable and beneficial cloud based environment
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We pay for a yearly subscription."
  • "The licensing costs attached to the solution are pretty high, but then, with the cloud model, the prices depend on what it provides for the value of money, which I feel was very high."

    • More Informatica Cloud Data Quality Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
    Top Answer:The profiling features are much better than the on-premise version.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
    Top Answer:We have complex datasets. Logical views are a little bit behind in comparison to the on-premise version.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Informatica Cloud Data Quality?
    Top Answer:The solution is used for data quality implementation. We handle the whole life cycle of data quality from end to end, including rule specification and exception handling.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ranking
    18th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    208
    Comparisons
    142
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    1,647
    Comparisons
    1,124
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    546
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    QualityStage
    Cloud Data Quality Radar
    Learn More
    IBM
    Informatica
    Overview
    IBM QualityStage is a foundational component for your data quality and information governance initiatives. It helps you create and maintain consistent views of key entities including customers, vendors, locations and products. This lets you investigate, cleanse and manage your data.

    Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar is a cloud application that quickly identifies, fixes, and monitors data quality problems in your business applications—wherever they are, in the cloud or on-premise.

    This easy-to-use, browser-based tool empowers line-of-business managers to take ownership of the data quality process so business can maximize the return on trusted data. Informatica Cloud Data Quality Radar enables you to quickly assess the strengths and weaknesses in your data, to track improvements in the data over time, and to calculate data quality scores for objects and field entities with the flexibility to filter and drill down on specific records for better detection of problems.

    Sample Customers
    PRO BTP, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Sicoob, NICE Systems, Integra LifeSciences Corp.
    Freddie Mac, Rabobank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Quality
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM QualityStage is ranked 18th in Data Quality while Informatica Cloud Data Quality is ranked 3rd in Data Quality with 8 reviews. IBM QualityStage is rated 9.0, while Informatica Cloud Data Quality is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM QualityStage writes "Has allowed my teams of developers to transfer data quickly and easily from SQL databases into Oracle databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Quality writes "Is user friendly and can handle large volumes of data without compromising performance". IBM QualityStage is most compared with IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Quality is most compared with Informatica Data Quality, Talend Data Quality and Syniti Data Quality.

    See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

    We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.