IBM eDiscovery Manager vs LexisNexis Concordance Classic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM eDiscovery Manager and LexisNexis Concordance Classic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ivan Castaneda
Use LexisNexis Concordance Classic?
Ranking
25th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
119
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
337
Comparisons
202
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
eDiscovery Manager
Concordance Classic
Learn More
Overview
IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks.
LexisNexis Concordance Desktop gives you more control over your cases by handling a heavier workload and enables you to perform near-native review and native document redaction, produce color or grayscale productions, perform bulk printing and use advanced production capabilities. It provides a multi-core, hyper-threaded import engine allows users to work on other things while they import data and provides a streamline review process by facilitating access of their database with co-counsel, expert witness and more without the need of their own license. The admin console allows administrators better insight into and control over databases and administrative tasks which provides teams more flexibility and it includes an intuitive search engines in litigation, so you can pinpoint key evidence. Concordance Desktop software accommodates 12 megabytes of data per field and It can handle a million records per database and can search up to 128 databases at one time. It has a multinational cases with Unicode foreign character language support. Easily work with documents in Chinese, Russian, Japanese, Arabic, Korean and Greek, as well as many European languages.
Sample Customers
Hansgrohe
Paralegal Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming & Fitzgerald L.L.P.
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
769,065 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is ranked 10th in eDiscovery. IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0, while LexisNexis Concordance Classic is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". On the other hand, IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with , whereas LexisNexis Concordance Classic is most compared with IPRO.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.