We performed a comparison between HPE Eucalyptus and Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control has an amazing GUI interface that does a lot of tasks with fewer steps rather than making it manual on the database or the operating system side."
"If you're using Oracle products, you should definitely use Oracle Enterprise Manager because it is central to product management."
"It is easier to manage your Oracle Database backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups (Succeeded or Failed)."
"Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
"The solution is stable. It is great in terms of Oracle products, especially for Oracle databases."
"The tool is mainly for monitoring databases, especially focusing on performance. It supports various databases, including Oracle, allowing daily activity monitoring. The solution enables displaying performance metrics, providing continuous tracking. It also offers management capabilities for connected databases, featuring graphical performance graphs. Users can perform tasks like killing sessions and controlling database elements. Additionally, it allows viewing tables, SAN disks, and other database components."
"The solution is reliable."
"You can create a system group (database, application, and web server), so you can monitor performance as a system."
"The customization should be improved."
"The product does have room for improvement in patch management."
"You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console."
"The only negative thing about this product is that it doesn't support all environments or all applications."
"When registering a host, only if your host is running Linux will you get all the information which is available on EM. It would be nice if in future releases to include IBM AIX (primarily) and Microsoft Windows (secondly)."
"There is a lack from the point of view of monitoring on the system. The performance of the system and its resources are things that I think can be improved. There needs to be real-time monitoring available on the solution."
"One of the things that can be improved is the quality of results generated by BI Publisher. They are somewhat confusing when it comes to analysis."
"The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
"Oracle Data Guard monitoring: There are no alerts for redo log transport failure."
More Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE Eucalyptus is ranked 38th in Cloud Management while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is ranked 16th in Cloud Management with 34 reviews. HPE Eucalyptus is rated 7.0, while Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Eucalyptus writes "Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control writes "A robust product to deal with application performance enhancemen". HPE Eucalyptus is most compared with OpenNebula, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control is most compared with AWS Control Tower, IBM Turbonomic and VMware Aria Operations.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
