We performed a comparison between Horizon3.ai and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Penetration testing and scans are useful features."
"Compliance and vulnerability scans are most valuable. Compliance scan helps in validating how our teams are complying, and vulnerability scan helps in future-proofing. Its vulnerability detection is accurate."
"One of the most valuable features is their distributed scan model for allotting engines to work together as a pool and handle multiple scans at once, across multiple environments. Automatic scanning distribution is a distinguishing feature of their toolset."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"Tenable's most valuable features are the credential scan, vulnerability reports, and vulnerability ratings (VPR)."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"The reports are quite useless."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"There is not much room for improvement. However, there should be a guide that describes the step-by-step procedures for doing tasks. Otherwise, training is required from a senior guy to a junior guy."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"At times we have had the typical bugs."
"The solution is expensive."
Horizon3.ai is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Horizon3.ai is rated 1.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Horizon3.ai writes "Doesn’t identify threats and vulnerabilities, and the reports are quite useless". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Horizon3.ai is most compared with Pentera, vPentest, Rapid7 Metasploit, Tenable Vulnerability Management and AttackIQ, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Tanium.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.