We performed a comparison between Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] and Symantec Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
"If you using IGA or access controls solutions then this solution is a good addon. Once Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is set up it does not require a lot of maintenance or attention."
"Password Management and Session Recording. The simplicity and ease that it is to be up and running out-of-the-box is very much appreciated."
"Whoever built it from the ground up, they understand how an organization is laid out."
"It's easy to use and easy to configure."
"The DB clustering is a really good benefit of using CA PAM."
"It is great for identity governance."
"The two factor authentication, and the single most important capability was it supported PIV and CAC as one of the two factors. That was pretty huge for us."
"We found that the architecture is scalable and very resilient."
"We have received good support from the tech support team."
"Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager is cumbersome and it does not operate by itself and relies on other solutions. Overall the way you configure things is a bit awkward compared to other solutions, such as Cyberark and Thycotic. The interface could be more intuitive, some features I expected to be easily accessible I had to search around for them. There needs to be more centralization."
"Bring more technology into the portfolio and being able to collapse those products into a much more integrated way."
"The response time for support could be faster. Some features should be added: cloud-based, VPN-less, more secure, and it should be adjusted in a hybrid environment."
"They should include some assignments in the test environment to explore the product's features."
"The management console could be improved."
"I wish it could create local accounts on desktops."
"We have to do a lot of manual work to automate features."
"The setup is complex."
"They need to do a little bit more on the mainframe side."
More Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Privileged Access Management (PAM) while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 18th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 50 reviews. Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] writes "Responsive support, requires little maintenance, but configuration could be easier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Allows IT and consultants to access the infrastructure environment but needs more security and better support". Hitachi ID Privileged Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ARCON Privileged Access Management and Delinea Secret Server.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
