We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Nutanix Unified Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Google Cloud Storage includes Docs, calendar, Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Meet."
"The responses from the technical team are fast...It is a stable product...We do have plans to increase the number of users since it is a scalable product."
"It's easy to use."
"It's simple to use."
"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."
"The solution is very flexible."
"The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information."
"It's very practical and reliable."
"Nutanix Volumes is a perfectly stable product."
"The most valuable feature is the unified dashboard, as it allows us to easily observe everything from a single location."
"The most valuable feature is the easy interface."
"The integration with Prism Central makes it a lot easier to manage, so we just have a single pane of glass location that we can go to. We do not have a separate admin console or anything that we have to use."
"What I like most about Nutanix Files Storage is the way it makes copies of the data. The solution also has high availability, which is excellent. Another valuable feature of Nutanix Files Storage is self-service, so users won't have to depend on the IT team much."
"The real-time alerts generated by this system enable us to swiftly address and mitigate such threats."
"The solution is easy to use, share, and manage."
"The solution is very easy to manage."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The solution should offer more free storage."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"The solution is good, however, it would benefit from increased storage without the additional cost."
"There are inefficiencies with cache when the names are sequencing."
"The solution could always be more user-friendly."
"They need more enhancements in the security features."
"I'm not really comfortable with the user interface because I don't use it very often."
"We have some problems with Nutanix Unified Storage's support because they asked us to change our hardware."
"We have had to deal with some infrastructure and general cluster issues but these issues don't impact storage."
"If they can add an integrated DLP feature, it would be great."
"Lowering the price would improve this product."
"One thing I'd appreciate is having a desktop application similar to what VMware offered."
"The feature request I have is for the consistent improvement of how user account permissions are assigned in Nutanix Unified Storage."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The implementation is a little bit complex and should be made easier."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Nutanix Unified Storage is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 39 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Nutanix Unified Storage is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Unified Storage writes "Provides good performance, longer uptime, and an easy way to manage our data". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Microsoft Azure File Storage, whereas Nutanix Unified Storage is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS and VAST Data. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Nutanix Unified Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
