FortiCache [EOL] vs Symantec Proxy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
2,465 views|2,014 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FortiCache [EOL] and Symantec Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has a nice graphic interface and it is easy to find information about effectively using the product because of the large user-base.""We think it's a good solution for cloud security, where one has hybrid cloud. They have different cloud solutions like a Office 365 or Azure or Amazon. This is a good solution to control all the different cloud solutions you have in your family of hybrid clouds, from one panel. This is what the main feature we look for.""I like the traffic monitoring because it meets the firewall protocols."

More FortiCache [EOL] Pros →

"It's a stable solution.""The content that we are getting is very good. Content caching is also supported.""The solution is scalable.""The product is very good, and the URL filtering database is great.""The developer's assistance is valuable, enabling seamless integration which allows for a comprehensive view of categories, even if not certified by the link.""We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.""The tool's most valuable features are content-to-content filtration and SCCM protection.""What I found most valuable in Symantec Proxy is that it doesn't have any limitations. It also has a simple configuration, with only one window pane, unlike Zscaler, which has multiple window panes. Deploying the agent is also more straightforward in Symantec Proxy."

More Symantec Proxy Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes when using high availability, the second firewall does not come up immediately if the first one goes down.""It should be set up more specifically so that I only pay for what I want.""However, we would like them to add more integrations. We would appreciate a more open solution. They're quite good when you have the entire Fortinet ecosystem, but otherwise it's not as good of a solution."

More FortiCache [EOL] Cons →

"Support response time and case resolution could be improved.""The platform's pricing needs improvement.""The solution is quite complex.""Marketing needs improvement in Symantec Proxy, as it needs to catch up in sales here in the Asia Pacific region. Symantec Proxy licensing renewal also needs improvement.""Improvements in log availability would greatly enhance its overall effectiveness.""There are performance issues with all of the proxies.""The initial setup is actually quite complex to install because our users don't have admin rights on the boxes and there's no remote install option by an administrator.""The traffic filtering could improve. Our firewall traffic is limited. Additionally, it would be helpful if there was a dashboard and reporting feature."

More Symantec Proxy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."
  • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In terms of cost, it is expensive. Its pricing has been a challenge for us since its acquisition by Broadcom."
  • "It's expensive. Clients often go to other products."
  • "Licensing is based on a subscription."
  • "The price is too expensive compared with that of another solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees required."
  • "There is a license needed to use Symantec Proxy."
  • "Our cost was based on a three-year upfront CapEx contract."
  • "Symantec Proxy has different expiry dates and renewal dates, which is a problem, so Broadcom should improve the licensing renewal process for the solution."
  • More Symantec Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We can address and rectify issues promptly, resulting in consistently positive outcomes.
    Top Answer:The product is highly priced. There are no additional costs apart from the standard licenses.
    Top Answer:The platform's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    14th
    Views
    2,465
    Comparisons
    2,014
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    435
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Blue Coat Encrypted Traffic Management, ProxySG Appliance
    Learn More
    Overview

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Symantec Proxy is designed to provide web security, web access control, and secure web gateway functionalities for organizations. It helps protect against web-based threats, enforce web usage policies, and provide secure access to internet resources.

    Symantec Proxy Benefits:

    • Easy to use
    • Comprehensive security features
    • Ability to block malicious websites and applications
    • Efficient management of network traffic
    • Scalable and compatible with various operating systems and devices
    • Highly rated customer support and technical assistance

    Symantec Proxy Features:

    • Web Filtering: Symantec Proxy offers web filtering capabilities to control and manage web access based on predefined categories or custom policies.
      1. Malware Protection: The solution incorporates malware detection and prevention mechanisms to identify and block web-based threats, such as malware, viruses, and phishing attacks. 
      2. URL Filtering: Symantec Proxy uses URL filtering to categorize and assess the reputation of web domains and URLs in real-time. 
      3. SSL/TLS Inspection: The proxy solution supports SSL/TLS decryption and inspection to examine encrypted web traffic for potential threats or policy violations. 
      4. Data Loss Prevention (DLP): Symantec Proxy may include data loss prevention capabilities to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive data through web channels. 
      5. User Authentication and Access Control: The solution supports user authentication and access control mechanisms to enforce user-based policies and provide secure internet access.
      6. Reporting and Analytics: Symantec Proxy provides reporting and analytics capabilities to monitor web usage, user activities, security events, and compliance violations.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Symantec Proxy users. 

      PeerSpot user, Consultant at a financial services firm, says that Symantec Proxy "...enables us to manage bandwidth for users based on their privilege levels. For example, if a user wants to use a certain application or resource, we can provide access based on their privileges."

      PeerSpot user, General Manager & founder at a engineering company, writes that Symantec Proxy has "A complex deployment, no proper user reporting, and a proxy component that works."

      Muhammad Salahuddin, Unit Head - Network and Security Solutions at FPM Solutions, states that Symantec Proxy has "Good URL filtering but is expensive and doesn't have good technical support services."

        Sample Customers
        Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
        Jefferies
        Top Industries
        No Data Available
        REVIEWERS
        Financial Services Firm42%
        Comms Service Provider17%
        Government8%
        Marketing Services Firm8%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company16%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Manufacturing Company11%
        Government7%
        Company Size
        No Data Available
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business33%
        Midsize Enterprise11%
        Large Enterprise56%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business17%
        Midsize Enterprise17%
        Large Enterprise67%
        Buyer's Guide
        WAN Optimization
        April 2024
        Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: April 2024.
        769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

        FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Symantec Proxy is ranked 14th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 18 reviews. FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Symantec Proxy is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Proxy writes "A user-friendly solution with good technical support". FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Proxy is most compared with Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, Skyhigh Security, Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway, Zscaler Internet Access and McAfee Web Gateway Cloud Service.

        We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.