We performed a comparison between ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform and Sonatype Repository Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."
"Another thing that I like about Sonatype is that if you download something today, and five days from today it becomes vulnerable, it will notify you."
"The product's network and intrusion protection features are valuable. It also has rules and compliance features for security."
"The anomaly detection could be improved."
"The tool needs to improve its file systems. The product should also include zero test feature."
"What I don't like is the lack of an option to pick up the phone and call someone for support. That is something they need to improve on. They need to have a professional services package, or they need to include that option with their services."
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is ranked 55th in Application Security Tools while Sonatype Repository Firewall is ranked 34th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is rated 0.0, while Sonatype Repository Firewall is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform writes "Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Repository Firewall writes "You will get clean code every time, and that's a great achievement". ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is most compared with Onapsis, whereas Sonatype Repository Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Cisco Secure Firewall, Black Duck, GitHub and Veracode.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
