We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Quest InTrust based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."It is scalable."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."
"It is very quick to react. I can set it to check anomalies or suspicious behavior every 30 seconds. It is very fast."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning capability."
"What customers found most valuable in Elastic Security feature-wise is the search capability, in particular, the way of writing the search query and the speed of searching for results."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it is more flexible than AlienVault."
"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."
"I would rate the technical support very well as they are knowledgeable and quick to respond."
"I would like more ways to manage permissions and restrict access to certain users."
"Technical support could respond faster."
"It could use maybe a little more on the Linux side."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"One thing they could add is a quick step to enable users who don't have a solid background to build a dashboard and quickly search, without difficulty."
"Anything that supports high availability or ease of deployment in a highly available environment would help to improve this solution."
"We're using the open-source edition, for now, I think maybe they can allow their OLED plugin to be open source, as at the moment it is commercialised."
"There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training."
"It needs to have better reporting. "
"It was very complex. There was poor native correlation. "
Earn 20 points
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while Quest InTrust is ranked 57th in Log Management. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Quest InTrust is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest InTrust writes "Technical support is knowledgeable and quick to respond". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Quest InTrust is most compared with Change Auditor for Windows File Servers and syslog-ng.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.