Digital.ai App Management [EOL] vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Temenos Logo
180 views|120 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM.""​Speeds up app deployment and management."

More Digital.ai App Management [EOL] Pros →

"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other.""It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space.""I like the complete, professional social site.""Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness.""The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs.""You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter.""With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user.""The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."

More Temenos Quantum Pros →

Cons
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further.""Needs a better API."

More Digital.ai App Management [EOL] Cons →

"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications""Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet.""It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends""The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content.""The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful.""One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries.""They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement.""Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

More Temenos Quantum Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
  • "This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
  • "The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
  • "Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
  • "It is expensive solution."
  • More Temenos Quantum Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Application Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother… more »
    Top Answer:The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Mobile Application Management
    3rd
    Views
    180
    Comparisons
    120
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    560
    Rating
    6.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Arxan Apperian, Apperian, Apperian App Management, Arxan Apperian App Management
    KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
    Learn More
    Temenos
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Shifts to the ‘extended enterprise’ mobile workforce require increased mobile collaboration and productivity apps. IT teams must securely distribute apps and support users’ needs. Enterprise mobile app management (MAM) enables IT to balance the unique needs of IT and remote users.

    Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

    Sample Customers
    DLL Group, NetApp, New Balance, Nvidia, Transportation Security Administration, Nationwide, Northrup Grumman, Santam, AT&T, McAfee, Georgia Southern University, Emory University,
    Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company63%
    Financial Services Firm38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%

    Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Application Management while Temenos Quantum is ranked 3rd in Mobile App Platforms with 15 reviews. Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow.

    We monitor all Mobile Application Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.