We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication."It can replicate data from a distant location and it can scan it as well. It has continuous data replication with almost no data loss."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"When it works, it is the best product that is available."
"The most valuable feature of the SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is the replication. We normally set it up to avoid any kind of data loss."
"The support is horrible."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"The product should provide integration with new products."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is a continuous process. However, during upgrades, there may be differences between the primary and SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server, requiring us to stop the replication. The Replication Server must have support for the database version, regardless of where it is being replicated from. Even if the database versions do not match, replication should still occur."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 18 reviews while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is ranked 14th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server writes "Useful data loss prevention, but upgrading requires replication halting ". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, whereas SAP Landscape Transformation Replication Server is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.