We performed a comparison between Dell AppSync and Hitachi ShadowImage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Delphix, IBM, Hitachi Vantara and others in Copy Data Management."This solution is very helpful and easy to use."
"I believe one of the advantages we saw was that the configuration was manageable."
"The most valuable feature of Hitachi ShadowImage is high-speed data transfer from one server to another. Other solutions would have problems with transferring 50 TB of data. I also like that Hitachi ShadowImage is easy to use."
"I would like to have the ability to bit the same system with multiple AppSync replications would definitely be beneficial to us. And general flexibility enhancements."
"It would be helpful if this product has features for transferring to the cloud."
"API and script configuration in Hitachi ShadowImage is sometimes complicated, so this is an area for improvement. Another area for improvement is that the Hitachi ShadowImage interface isn't as user-friendly."
Dell AppSync is ranked 4th in Copy Data Management while Hitachi ShadowImage is ranked 7th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell AppSync is rated 8.4, while Hitachi ShadowImage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell AppSync writes "Simple to install, reliable, and has good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hitachi ShadowImage writes "Easy to use and can do high-speed data transfers from one server to another". Dell AppSync is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Dell RecoverPoint, Delphix, Vision Solutions Double-Take and NetApp SnapMirror, whereas Hitachi ShadowImage is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy and Hitachi Thin Image Advanced.
We monitor all Copy Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.