We performed a comparison between CyberGRX and Skybox Security Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."The interface is simple to use."
"Skybox deployment is simple, and it's very useful."
"The most valuable features are Firewall Assurance and Vulnerability Control."
"We use Network Assurance for network visualisation and troubleshooting."
"The revalidation and policy recertifications are most valuable."
"The solution's simplicity of use is its most valuable feature."
"Correlates logs and threats and prioritizes; provides network maps;p provides change result context and resulting vulnerability."
"The most valuable feature is firewall management."
"instead of asking for firewall rules which may or may not be relevant, or could already be there, or could be over-permissioned, Skybox can be used to map out the resources that that application is going to use and provide the exact rules that an application would require to function correctly. If the traffic isn't able to flow for the application, if it's erring out, Skybox can be used to troubleshoot that and say, "All right, where is the traffic being stopped and why, and how do I fix that.""
"There are not many partners for this product in India, which makes the OEM very difficult to reach."
"The vendor's support is terrible."
"The primary room for improvement would be to enable a web interface, which is not something which is there in the product. This is supposed to have come a year, a year and a half ago, but still has failed to come out. It still needs a client application to be installed on a workstation to be able to access that server and then run these reports. So I cannot extend that access to anybody. It has to be one administrator all the time. So unlike a web interface, where you can give multiple users simultaneous access and generate the various reports, that isn't a possibility at the moment."
"The cloud site could be better. They should provide some use cases to help users."
"I've had issues with licensing where, when they were expiring and I asked for the updated licenses, I would the wrong ones. I think their process needs to be straightened out a little bit - I don't know if they fixed it already, it has been awhile. It wasn't as straightforward as it could have been."
"If anything could be improved it would be staying on top of the collector scripts, but I understand that's a very tough challenge."
"There is room for improvement in the technical support."
"The price is costly, and I hope they can reduce the cost."
"The tool does not offer options for customization."
Earn 20 points
CyberGRX is ranked 52nd in Vulnerability Management while Skybox Security Suite is ranked 18th in Vulnerability Management with 34 reviews. CyberGRX is rated 6.0, while Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CyberGRX writes "Scales well and technical support is good, but it is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". CyberGRX is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, SecurityScorecard and UpGuard Vendor Risk, whereas Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.