We performed a comparison between Collibra Privacy & Risk and Microsoft Purview Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance.
"Rules and policies on workflows are really strong."
"The ability to classify data quickly and effortlessly is arguably Microsoft Purview's most valuable feature."
"It is critical that Purview delivers data protection across multi-cloud and multi-platform environments. That is the number one reason that people are adopting hybrid and best-of-the-breed approaches. Especially in banking, it is critical because people want to protect, govern, and secure their data. This is one of the first conversations that happens with security and the architecture group on the client side."
"Has a good interface and is reasonably priced."
"The data classification part of the solution is excellent, especially as it gives us an insight into our sensitive data within Microsoft 365."
"Data segregation is the most valuable feature."
"The most significant value lies in its seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, automating various processes and reducing operational burdens."
"One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility."
"The user interface is highly intuitive and user-friendly."
"Connectivity with different applications could be improved."
"Two features are unsupported—custom insights and the DLP component—that would be beneficial to me as a consultant and for the customer in terms of security and monitoring. Regarding security, DLP would provide a more granular level of data masking. Custom insights would offer more detailed monitoring and alerts that can notify customers of failures or anything requiring urgent action."
"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."
"he one thing it doesn't do is data quality."
"Some of the menu headings may not be easy to understand for some people."
"The overall cost of deploying this solution could be better. It seems that middle and small-sized organizations are not completely happy with deploying this solution in terms of the cost. It would be good if they concentrate on the cost part."
"I'd like to see them improve the training for implementing this type of solution."
"The Microsoft Purview data connector platform, which supports ingestion from non-Microsoft data sources, can be somewhat complex."
"Reflecting organizational changes within Purview is impractical."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Collibra Privacy & Risk is ranked 39th in Data Governance while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 48 reviews. Collibra Privacy & Risk is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Collibra Privacy & Risk writes "Key to controlling data and the knowledge around where data is; strong workflow policies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". Collibra Privacy & Risk is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Microsoft Intune.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
