We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"The client site login is pretty extensible and probably cost-effective."
"We can do things in minutes instead of days."
"You can integrate Splunk with third-party security automation solutions and set rules for automatic response."
"It scales better in the cloud than on-premise."
"The reporting aspect is good and it does what I need it to do."
"It has helped us look at modern technology, as well as penetrate our legacy systems, to see where the bottlenecks are."
"The best part of Splunk Enterprise Security is its customizable settings."
"It is the best tool if you have a complex environment or if data ingestion is too huge."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"The GUI could be improved to include some of the capabilities that other BI solutions have. The layout is a little restrictive where you can’t resize all the panels to exactly how you would like them without tweaking some XML code."
"I would like Splunk to add more integration. QRadar has many indications with more products than Splunk."
"The monitoring aspect of Splunk could be improved. We have to do some queries to get as much information as CrowdStrike or other solutions provide. If you run a big query, you will see a delay. That is the only concern we have because it will take some time if you query large data sets."
"Make it easier to include roles and user controls, as it is horrible now."
"I would like to get visibility into the data pipelines on heavy forwarders and indexers to see exactly their source and the cause of saturation when it occurs. This would help us learn even more about our high use applications."
"We do have to educate developers on how to not blow it up. It is a little to easy to write an expensive query and overly stress the system. This could be improved."
"Writing queries is a bit complicated sometimes."
"Splunk could enhance its services by providing more comprehensive professional assistance aimed at optimizing our investment."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 61st in Data Integration while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
