• Home
  • Cloudbric vs. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

Cloudbric vs R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Cloudbric Logo

    Cloudbric

    Read 2 Cloudbric reviews
    views| comparisons
    66% willing to recommend
    Rohde & Schwarz Logo

    R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

    Read 1 R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) review
    537 views|250 comparisons
    100% willing to recommend
    Featured Review
    Anonymous User
    Getting it running while retaining my mail service was tricky as I did not have control over my server. But working...
    It has provided us a safe and reliable way of circumventing the many perils of hosting a site on today's internet.
    SeydouSidibe
    Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available
    By publishing the application without fear, my customer has created new revenue by making the website available anytime and anywhere. We noticed a... Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?
    Top Answer:Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    31st
    out of 79 in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Views
    537
    Comparisons
    250
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
    Learn More
    Cloudbric
    Rohde & Schwarz
    Overview
    Cloudbric is a cloud-based web security provider, offering an award-winning Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS protection, and SSL. Utilizing a logic-based detection engine to filter malicious website traffic with proven precision, Cloudbric delivers lower false positives than any industry competitor. Cloudbric’s cloud-based web security services are free for all websites with less than 4GB of bandwidth per month. We charge based on amount of web traffic, making Cloudbric perfect for SMEs, new startups, and personal websites.

    Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

    Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise70%

    Cloudbric doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 31st in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Cloudbric is rated 9.6, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cloudbric writes "Getting it running while retaining my mail service was tricky as I did not have control over my server. But working through several issues with my server and Cloudbric we were able to make it work. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Cloudbric is most compared with , whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai App and API Protector.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.