We performed a comparison between Cisco Network Assurance Engine and Ekahau Site Survey based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, NetAlly, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation."It is scalable from the beginning. It is a product that you can scale upwards whenever you want."
"In a short amount of time, you can see what went wrong on a screen in a report."
"The standout feature of Cisco Network Assurance Engine is its ability to proactively detect and prevent network issues before they occur."
"It is easy to set up."
"I have found the most valuable feature is the RF interference and integration capabilities."
"We are satisfied with the way this product is working."
"It's easy to plot APs and generate reports."
"I like Ekahau's interface and the reports it can generate."
"The most valuable when it comes to this solution for me is the fact that I don't have to go out and do a site survey. With this solution, I can do it all predictably with the usual 90% accuracy."
"I like that our users can send us a floor map. Sometimes it's not feasible to travel to another country where the users are based. So, the floor map is very useful. It's a fantastic product."
"The solution is user-friendly and it provides a good output that can be measured, and I can describe and pinpoint any inaccuracy shortfalls."
"Ekahau Site Survey is scalable."
"The scalability is one of the biggest failures of the solution."
"At the beginning, the setup was complex."
"To enhance Cisco Network Assurance Engine, simplifying its interface and making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."
"It needs authentication beyond just local and LDAP. It should also have TACACS+ and RADIUS."
"Ekahau would benefit by making improvements to lag time."
"I wish the solution was better at making different survey modes."
"They should improve the iPad application because it's unstable. Also, Ekahau could be better integrated with other vendors."
"The support is an area in need of improvement."
"I would say that the indoor site accuracy is pretty good but the outdoor one should be improved. I would say if there was a way to put trees in there and canopies, that would be great."
"Ekahau Site Survey is an expensive solution, and its pricing should be improved."
"Most features are there, but the network adapter support should be better. Ekahau should support all laptops and versions. There's an issue with the driver too."
"The report generation has room for improvement and is missing small details."
Cisco Network Assurance Engine is ranked 5th in Network Modeling and Simulation with 4 reviews while Ekahau Site Survey is ranked 1st in Network Modeling and Simulation with 30 reviews. Cisco Network Assurance Engine is rated 8.0, while Ekahau Site Survey is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Network Assurance Engine writes "Helps to easily detect and resolve issues like security threats, bandwidth usage concerns, and performance bottlenecks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ekahau Site Survey writes "Valuable troubleshooting tools and easy to scale, but outdated documentation, issues with stability, and lacks differentiated survey modes". Cisco Network Assurance Engine is most compared with , whereas Ekahau Site Survey is most compared with AirMagnet Survey, iBwave Wi-Fi, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and RedSeal.
See our list of best Network Modeling and Simulation vendors.
We monitor all Network Modeling and Simulation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
