Checkmarx One vs Symantec Web Application Firewall comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Checkmarx and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 in AS , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 7.3% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #31 in WAF , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

29,420 Views
16,181 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Read 4 Symantec Web Application Firewall reviews

1,213 Views
1,092 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Symantec Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (3rd)

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (31st)

Mindshare comparison

Checkmarx One and Symantec Web Application Firewall aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Checkmarx One is designed for Application Security Tools and holds a mindshare of 7.3%, down 10.2% compared to last year.
Symantec Web Application Firewall, on the other hand, focuses on Web Application Firewall (WAF), holds 0.8% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	7.3%
SonarQube	10.8%
Snyk	5.0%
Other	76.9%

Application Security Tools

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Web Application Firewall	0.8%
Imperva Application Security Platform	7.4%
Cloudflare	5.0%
Other	86.8%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Vatsal Mehta

Director, Co-Founder & CEO at HEDEHI Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Boosts Security Measures with Easy Deployment and Implementation

Regarding areas for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall, I think they can enhance the features they currently focus on, as there are various types of web applications, and it would be great if they could develop features to cater to all these types. For example, a feature to scan for unauthorized plugins or extensions could let us know if those extensions are authorized, unauthorized, or malicious. There's room for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall by introducing AI into their dashboard so that we can query the dashboard and fetch data insights, similar to querying ChatGPT for answers. They currently have this feature but can make improvements for better querying to get insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."

"The tool's valuable features include integrating GPT and Copilot. Additionally, the UI web representation is very user-friendly, making navigation easy. GPT has made several improvements to my security code."

"They have some of the best features which make the product wonderful."

"It has all the features we need."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted the organization, and since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days, saving time and increasing speed to market by reducing the timeline from three or four days to one day only."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities, and they are always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database, so I am assured that when I am scanning my product those vulnerabilities are identified at very initial stages, giving my development team more time to react."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization, especially in our CI/CD integration, where when we try to build any feature, they are always scanned by Checkmarx before they get released."

"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It provides us with a sense of security."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The setup was straightforward."

"The solution has an up-to-date data repository to deal with external threats."

"The best feature of Symantec Web Application Firewall is that it is very easy to use, and the deployment and implementation processes are really easy."

"This product is doing what it should and what we are expecting from it."

Cons

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"The stability of Checkmarx could improve. We're having issues with it, and the scan reliability is sometimes impacted so we sometimes have to restart the services to allow scans out of the queue."

"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

"We had to lock the number of CPUs used to not crash the Checkmarx Audit."

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

More Checkmarx One cons

"There's room for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall by introducing AI into their dashboard so that we can query the dashboard and fetch data insights, similar to querying ChatGPT for answers."

"One of our issues is that sometimes scanning slows down the endpoints."

"It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java."

"On a scale from one to 10, I would give it a five. I'm not convinced that it's necessarily the best solution going forward in the future."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"The solution is costly."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"It's relatively expensive."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Web Application Firewall?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Web Application Firewall?

Our use case for Symantec Web Application Firewall is primarily for security purposes as we develop web application solutions for our customers. We have a business where we provide solutions for cr...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Symantec Web Application Firewall?

I would recommend Symantec Web Application Firewall to other users due to all the benefits I mentioned earlier, such as ease of use, ease of implementation, good technical support, and compared to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 24% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

NetScaler vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 14% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 3% of the time

More Symantec Web Application Firewall Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

September 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

September 2026

Symantec Web Application Firewall report

Download Symantec Web Application Firewall product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec WAF, Blue Coat Protecting Web Applications

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Symantec Web Application Firewall is a robust tool designed to secure web applications by protecting against a variety of cyber threats and ensuring compliance with security standards.

It offers comprehensive security by inspecting incoming and outgoing traffic for potential threats and vulnerabilities. Designed to integrate seamlessly with existing infrastructures, it provides constant monitoring and advanced threat protection. Users benefit from its adaptability and ease of deployment, making it suitable for organizations looking to enhance their web protection strategy.

What are the key features?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats in real-time to prevent data breaches.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Easy Deployment: Offers a straightforward setup process, minimizing the need for extensive technical resources.
Compliance Management: Helps meet regulatory requirements effortlessly with seamless updates.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed security analytics to improve risk management.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Reduces vulnerability to web-based attacks, enhancing overall protection.
Cost-Effective Solution: Offers significant savings by eliminating the need for multiple security tools.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes business disruption by quickly mitigating threats.
Enhanced Visibility: Promotes better decision-making with in-depth security insights.

Symantec Web Application Firewall finds application in sectors like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce where data protection and compliance are critical. Its ability to safeguard sensitive information makes it a valuable asset in environments demanding high levels of security assurance.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.