Checkmarx One vs Symantec Web Application Firewall comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Checkmarx and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 in AS , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 6.8% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #31 in WAF , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

31,996 Views
16,958 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Read 4 Symantec Web Application Firewall reviews

1,452 Views
1,307 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Symantec Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (13th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (6th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (4th), AI Security (4th)

Symantec Web Application Fi...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (31st)

Mindshare comparison

Checkmarx One and Symantec Web Application Firewall aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Checkmarx One is designed for Application Security Tools and holds a mindshare of 6.8%, down 10.3% compared to last year.
Symantec Web Application Firewall, on the other hand, focuses on Web Application Firewall (WAF), holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	6.8%
SonarQube	10.2%
Snyk	4.8%
Other	78.2%

Application Security Tools

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Web Application Firewall	0.9%
Imperva Application Security Platform	7.2%
Cloudflare	5.0%
Other	86.9%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Vatsal Mehta

Director, Co-Founder & CEO at HEDEHI Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Boosts Security Measures with Easy Deployment and Implementation

Regarding areas for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall, I think they can enhance the features they currently focus on, as there are various types of web applications, and it would be great if they could develop features to cater to all these types. For example, a feature to scan for unauthorized plugins or extensions could let us know if those extensions are authorized, unauthorized, or malicious. There's room for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall by introducing AI into their dashboard so that we can query the dashboard and fetch data insights, similar to querying ChatGPT for answers. They currently have this feature but can make improvements for better querying to get insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted my organization, especially in our CI/CD integration, where when we try to build any feature, they are always scanned by Checkmarx before they get released."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"Both automatic and manual code review (CxQL) are valuable."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things, and it also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"It provides a graphical view of any vulnerabilities."

More Checkmarx One pros

"This product is doing what it should and what we are expecting from it."

"The best feature of Symantec Web Application Firewall is that it is very easy to use, and the deployment and implementation processes are really easy."

"It provides us with a sense of security."

"The solution has an up-to-date data repository to deal with external threats."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The setup was straightforward."

Cons

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"Scanning speed optimization is an area where improvements can be made, and we can reduce false positives."

"This solution is not very easily scalable, and seems to lack the capability to manage a high volume of applications."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"Dynamic testing. If it had that feature I would have liked to see more consideration of framework validations that we don't have to duplicate. These flags are false positives."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

"The stability of Checkmarx could improve. We're having issues with it, and the scan reliability is sometimes impacted so we sometimes have to restart the services to allow scans out of the queue."

"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported."

More Checkmarx One cons

"On a scale from one to 10, I would give it a five. I'm not convinced that it's necessarily the best solution going forward in the future."

"There's room for improvement in Symantec Web Application Firewall by introducing AI into their dashboard so that we can query the dashboard and fetch data insights, similar to querying ChatGPT for answers."

"One of our issues is that sometimes scanning slows down the endpoints."

"It would be an improvement if the management dashboards were not reliant upon Java."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Web Application Firewall?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Web Application Firewall?

Our use case for Symantec Web Application Firewall is primarily for security purposes as we develop web application solutions for our customers. We have a business where we provide solutions for cr...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Symantec Web Application Firewall?

I would recommend Symantec Web Application Firewall to other users due to all the benefits I mentioned earlier, such as ease of use, ease of implementation, good technical support, and compared to ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 20% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

NetScaler vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 12% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 11% of the time

LevelBlue Managed Web Application & API Protection (WAAP) vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Symantec Web Application Firewall

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Web Application Firewall Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

October 2026

Symantec Web Application Firewall report

Download Symantec Web Application Firewall product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec WAF, Blue Coat Protecting Web Applications

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Symantec Web Application Firewall is a robust tool designed to secure web applications by protecting against a variety of cyber threats and ensuring compliance with security standards.

It offers comprehensive security by inspecting incoming and outgoing traffic for potential threats and vulnerabilities. Designed to integrate seamlessly with existing infrastructures, it provides constant monitoring and advanced threat protection. Users benefit from its adaptability and ease of deployment, making it suitable for organizations looking to enhance their web protection strategy.

What are the key features?

Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats in real-time to prevent data breaches.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs without compromising performance.
Easy Deployment: Offers a straightforward setup process, minimizing the need for extensive technical resources.
Compliance Management: Helps meet regulatory requirements effortlessly with seamless updates.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed security analytics to improve risk management.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Reduces vulnerability to web-based attacks, enhancing overall protection.
Cost-Effective Solution: Offers significant savings by eliminating the need for multiple security tools.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes business disruption by quickly mitigating threats.
Enhanced Visibility: Promotes better decision-making with in-depth security insights.

Symantec Web Application Firewall finds application in sectors like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce where data protection and compliance are critical. Its ability to safeguard sensitive information makes it a valuable asset in environments demanding high levels of security assurance.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.