We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"Good interface and visibility."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"The way they offer container security is a big highlight that I have noticed. The solution is also agentless, so the scanning, runtime, really everything is offered directly by CloudGuard."
"The product enables us to check the information that goes out of the company."
"Overall, it provides good security."
"This solution has saved the company from unnecessary data loss that occurs due to cyber attacks."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability on demand, which allows for potentially lower costs, and Built-in resiliency."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"The most valuable feature is that the solution can be deployed in the cloud which removes the expense of a server."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and logging functionalities."
"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."
"It’s user-friendly."
"The console or the GUI of OpenShift is awesome. You can do a lot of things from there. You can perform administration tasks as well as development tasks."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"Dome9 should also support deployments that are on-premises and in a hybrid cloud."
"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."
"Down the road, we would like to see automation. That is probably a feature that most people want. If they can automate patching a vulnerability, it will be much easier."
"You do need to pay extra in order to get better support."
"I would like to see tighter integration with other compliance tools, like Chef Compliance, in addition to Inspector."
"Compliance checks on cloud resources against various industry standards and compliance framework templates need to be improved."
"The costs are high."
"Reporting should have more options."
"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."
"The setup process is not great."
"The support costs are too high."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
"OpenShift Container Platform could improve by having better integration."
"OpenShift has a pretty steep learning curve. It's not an easy tool to use. It's not only OpenShift but Kubernetes itself. The good thing is that Red Hat provides specific targeted training. There are five or six pieces of training where you can get certifications. The licenses for OpenShift are pretty expensive, so they could be cheaper because the competition isn't sleeping, and Red Hat must take that into account."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Container Management with 63 reviews while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Rancher Labs. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. OpenShift Container Platform report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
