We performed a comparison between Check Point Application Control and Zscaler CASB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The central management system provides a reliable platform for application control and URL filtering."
"It improved the performance outcome for all our verticals due to more automation in system security, which helped in the identification and blockage of malware-affected applications and widgets."
"The best value we have is their actionable reports on user analytics, events, and activity that are extracted from their database."
"The tool's most valuable features are VPN access, website defense, and maintenance."
"The most important characteristic is granularity, which allows our teams to have different security profiles depending on the department to be protected."
"It ensures that the health of each application can handle the set tasks and projects without any challenges."
"The product offers easy-to-install policies and makes it simple to troubleshoot application-related traffic."
"We can control bandwidth and high-risk application access from our network using application control."
"Overall, the solution does a pretty good job at web filtering."
"The tool's scalability is good."
"It has been helpful in maintaining our infrastructure. The granular level control it offers allows us to set application policies per application for each user."
"Zscaler CASB's latency and architecture are excellent."
"The most valuable features of Zscaler CASB are API integration and DLP."
"Has a good zero trust feature."
"More and more product specifications should be infused with new incumbent features in the market to stay relevant and concurrent with the organization's needs."
"SD-WAN functionality can be added."
"They are expensive products due to the fact that we have to buy blades for each solution that we want to integrate into our corporate."
"We expect applications to be updated regularly."
"Something important to mention is the improvement at the support level. It could be more advanced."
"Configuration and deployment are a little bit difficult."
"The one feature that could be improved would be the ability to see implicit rules that are defaulted on the policy."
"It would be nice if there was a platform and small application owners could come and send their own applications' name and IP information from there."
"The pre-defined dictionaries could be improved."
"User management can be improved."
"It needs to offer SSO, single sign-on, and items of that nature."
"Zscaler CASB should include integrations with other SaaS applications."
"Zscaler CASB breaks down at times."
"The solution's granularity should be improved because it has limited granular options to control, visible, allow, block, delay, and receive."
More Check Point Application Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Application Control is ranked 1st in Application Control with 34 reviews while Zscaler CASB is ranked 6th in Application Control with 6 reviews. Check Point Application Control is rated 8.8, while Zscaler CASB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Application Control writes "Reliable, reduces management requirements, and lessens manual interventions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler CASB writes "A stable solution that provides API integration and DLP, but lacks integrations with other SaaS applications". Check Point Application Control is most compared with VMware Carbon Black App Control, Ivanti Application Control and WatchGuard Application Control, whereas Zscaler CASB is most compared with Skyhigh Security, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, ThreatLocker Elevation Control, Cisco Umbrella and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Check Point Application Control vs. Zscaler CASB report.
See our list of best Application Control vendors.
We monitor all Application Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.