We performed a comparison between Change Tracker Gen7 R2 and Cisco NGIPS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Whitelisting services are the most valuable feature of Change Tracker Gen7 R2."
"I have contacted the support once and the experience was good, I was satisfied."
"The most valuable features of Cisco NGIPS are protection and reporting."
"It has helped to improve our cybersecurity and our network security posture."
"IPS is a valuable function, because they update the signatures all the time and it's very granular."
"I configured the system myself and the process was okay."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I like the way the tool pushes the packets from the node level."
"The top features of Cisco NGIPS, which have been working very well, include stateful inspection and the access list-based security configuration. But from my perspective, the best part of Cisco NGIPS is the licensing process, which is very easy and straightforward. It's essentially copy-paste licensing."
"We have found the product to be quite stable."
"The solution could improve by being more secure and have better integration."
"The solution could include more integrations."
"There are some features not found in Firepower, like data loss prevention, and SSO, to have a connection between Cisco and Active Directory which was introduced on other products."
"The solution requires better management. When it comes to central management capabilities, improvements can be made."
"The pricing is very expensive. They should make their equipment more affordable."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see the sanctions lifted so we could use the full solution and have the speed increased."
"The CLI, the console line interface, of the FTD could be improved. It's very complex, so without a GUI, it doesn't work well. I would like it to be more simple."
"Should include additional security features."
"We have a separate management controller for Cisco NGIPS. If they have not done it already they should integrate Cisco NGIPS with the Cloud Portal."
Change Tracker Gen7 R2 is ranked 21st in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 2 reviews while Cisco NGIPS is ranked 5th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 63 reviews. Change Tracker Gen7 R2 is rated 9.0, while Cisco NGIPS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Change Tracker Gen7 R2 writes "A stable solution that can be used for secure configuration management and file integrity monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco NGIPS writes "Very effective for malware and signature-based anomalies but stability needs improvement". Change Tracker Gen7 R2 is most compared with Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise, whereas Cisco NGIPS is most compared with Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention. See our Change Tracker Gen7 R2 vs. Cisco NGIPS report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.