We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The machine learning feature is valuable."
"Recently, Splunk upgraded to version 9.0.02, which includes excellent data dashboards and visualization effects."
"The ability to ingest different log types from many different products in our environment is most valuable."
"Splunk Enterprise Security's dashboards are a key asset."
"The technical support is among the best in the market."
"The product is adept at log mining."
"Splunk has helped improve our company's resilience level."
"There are quite a lot of things that we find useful. Splunk agents are useful and good. Its UI is quite impressive."
"Its integration is most valuable. Its UI is also pretty much easy."
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."
"They can incorporate the SOAR solution within the actual product so that we do not require two different products, two different installations, and two different pricing methods. In regards to UBA, I am familiar with the UBA that existed two years ago. I am not updated about it today, but two years ago, UBA required such an amount of data that from a cost perspective, it was not worth it. When you compare it to what you get out of the box with Microsoft Sentinel without additional costs, there is no match."
"The configuration had a bit of a learning curve."
"My biggest struggle with Splunk in general is memorizing all the commands. If I want to know which users have logged in between certain hours, I cannot write that query out. It would be helpful to have AI so that I can explain in simple terms what I want and then the search gives that back to me. I am waiting for that."
"Splunk Enterprise Security could improve in automation, flexibility, and providing more content out of the box."
"Splunk needs local technical support."
"It is a challenge to manage the environment in such a way, that one’s log, even with the bandwidth license, isn’t exceeded."
"Integrating tools and creating use cases could be easier. It's hard for a junior security engineer with only a couple of years of experience to write use cases. They can do it, but it's much easier in a solution like IBM QRadar. Setting conditions is like a multiple-choice type of thing. It's a more user-friendly process."
"Enterprise security: Splunk must work on clarifying the solution to customers and explain how to gain more from it."
Earn 20 points
Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 228 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Centerity Monitor is most compared with Nagios XI, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.