Cavirin vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cavirin Systems Logo
33 views|17 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tufin Logo
248 views|158 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cavirin and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Overall, this is a good solution that scales well. It is easily deployed and is non intrusive on systems."

More Cavirin Pros →

"It provides a real-time sense of how the policies are configured and whether there are any shadow rules. Another great thing is that it provides greater reporting based on how the rules have been set up.""I like the policy topology map, which allows us to visualize the picture of the security policy of the whole organization.""The most valuable features are the GUI interface and the API.""It provides a great visibility around the roots: Root implementing which can be done, roots that have changed, and what has been done. So, it's pretty useful when you have an audit going on.""In the past, we would do certain things because of private knowledge of people's own understanding of the network. We don't have to rely on just that piece of it, because of the topology. We now know which firewalls come into play.""Its ability to detect changes within our firewall.""The visibility is huge. In order to figure out what was going on previously, we would have to pull stuff out of firewalls and put them in spreadsheets, then do sorts. Now, it's all right there in Tufin. We can write reports to look for what we need, ad hoc searches to find object groups, and know which firewalls are on. This was almost impossible to do previously.""The policy overview is valuable."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pros →

Cons
"The reporting for this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have an extension into the on-prem for CIS in compliance reporting."

More Cavirin Cons →

"The reports could be easier to read and more customizable. Also, capturing some of the different versions, and being able to dig through them could be a bit better.""The documentation site is horrible as well. It has a tree structure, and you really get lost quite easily.""Integration for Layer 2 devices could be improved because it requires manual scripting.""We would like to see automation metrics, from a reporting standpoint. We would also like to see automation of site-to-site VPN tunnels. We would like to see automation of Check Point application-based firewall rules.""The change workflow process is flexible and customizable to some extent, but there is room for improvement. In some cases, we've found it difficult to get the exact thing which we were looking for. Then, we end up having to go and do the thing manually.""It would be great to add a link to Visio to create shapes directly from Tufin, as it has the configuration.""The biggest area where I see a need for improvement is some of the documentation and training stuff. It does a really good job of hitting the big concepts, but it needs like another layer deeper of actually getting into some of the details of how to do some of the things. Conceptually, I understand how the product works, but now how do I start building stuff and integrating it into my environment.""They've got such a large number of APIs, and it is so easy to use their APIs. Effectively, they allow us to use it with anything. The only way to improve it more is by offering support for implementing their APIs into certain hardware or software that we might use. They can provide support for implementing APIs."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."
  • "Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."
  • "The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."
  • "The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."
  • "We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."
  • "Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."
  • "This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."
  • "Tufin reduced the time it takes to solve a problem, which reduces the time of the outage."
  • More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Overall, this is a good solution that scales well. It is easily deployed and is non intrusive on systems.
    Top Answer:The reporting for this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have an extension into the on-prem for CIS in compliance reporting.
    Top Answer:Cavirin provides reports that are useful and actionable within 30 minutes. These reports show the configuration of servers and applications and if they're in compliance with specific standards. It… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company, for example, what is allowed or not. We are able to check the rules over… more »
    Top Answer:Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the… more »
    Top Answer:The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a… more »
    Ranking
    29th
    out of 60 in Container Security
    Views
    33
    Comparisons
    17
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    229
    Rating
    7.0
    23rd
    out of 60 in Container Security
    Views
    248
    Comparisons
    158
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tufin SecureCloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cavirin's software solution is deployable within minutes on-premise or within AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, delivering first remediation guidance in under 30 minutes. It uniquely offers both cloud security posture management as well as continuous compliance for Linux, Windows, and Docker workloads (servers). Our software automates protection, monitoring, and response. Read below for some of Cavirin's industry-leading capabilities.

    Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

    Sample Customers
    Pacific Dental Services, AIG, Aryaka, GreenSky, Outbrain, Gusto, Proofpoint, SugarCRM, Verizon, UCSF
    3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cavirin is ranked 29th in Container Security with 1 review while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 23rd in Container Security with 180 reviews. Cavirin is rated 7.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cavirin writes "Cyber security solution that provides actionable reports within 30 minutes and completes auto patching". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Cavirin is most compared with , whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer.

    See our list of best Container Security vendors.

    We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.