We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and JFrog Pipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."The integration with other applications is fabulous."
"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."
"Code deployment is the best feature."
"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."
"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."
"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."
"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."
"The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."
"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass."
"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."
"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."
"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."
"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."
"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."
"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."
"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."
Earn 20 points
AWS CodePipeline is ranked 3rd in Build Automation with 13 reviews while JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation. AWS CodePipeline is rated 8.4, while JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodePipeline writes "A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". AWS CodePipeline is most compared with GitLab, AWS CodeStar, Jenkins, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, Harness, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
