We performed a comparison between AWS Application Migration Service and vCloud Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Zerto, Nasuni and others in Cloud Migration."Live Migration's best feature is that it's free."
"The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten."
"The product allows us to add or remove features."
"There are various options for scaling and that flexibility is a good option."
"We can run it on self-hosted systems, and we are happy with the stability of vCloud Director."
"This solution has helped us make money and provision our clients faster."
"The most valuable features of the vCloud Director are global management, added services, and automation."
"I like the functionality that's available with Orchestrator. The platform stability stuff that I would be involved in worries me from the automation side because you have a lot less hands-on control of things. Price point, it kind of puts us off."
"The compatibility with vSAN and NSX is the greatest feature of vCloud. It also has integration with vROps, which is quite nice."
"The most valuable feature of vCloud Director is its ability to host customers on their own cloud."
"Live Migration has some issues with target setups."
"I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure."
"One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud."
"We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution."
"I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud."
"vCloud Director isn't cheap."
"The solution should integrate with other cloud systems such as Azure ARC and OpenStack."
"Database services need to go beyond what they are currently doing."
"It would be great if Microsoft and VMware come together and become a common tool."
"There are too many errors, it could be more stable."
"I had issues with the support, but I also learned from the support. There is room for improvement in the response time."
"The product could use a billing feature so we can automate billing for clients."
"We use vCloud Director along with Terraform, and it's difficult to make them work together. It takes a long time to deploy virtual machines with Terraform in vCloud Director. For example, it can take about one or two hours to create 10 machines. It takes up a lot of our DevOps' and engineers' time in comparison to that with other solutions. This is an area that they should work on and improve."
More AWS Application Migration Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Application Migration Service is ranked 8th in Cloud Migration with 5 reviews while vCloud Director is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 61 reviews. AWS Application Migration Service is rated 8.2, while vCloud Director is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Application Migration Service writes "Well priced, easy to expand, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCloud Director writes "Offers flexibility of handling workloads and good scalability". AWS Application Migration Service is most compared with Zerto and Carbonite Migrate, whereas vCloud Director is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), Morpheus, VMware Aria Operations and CloudStack.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.