We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and Gemalto Protiva based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The most valuable feature is its knowledge."
"The solution offers high performance."
"The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved."
"DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory."
"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."
"The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release."
"The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users."
"Needs more available consultants and implementation partners."
"The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively."
"An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products."
"The user interface needs improvement."
Earn 20 points
Atos DirX Directory is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while Gemalto Protiva doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while Gemalto Protiva is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gemalto Protiva writes "Strong authentication permits our organization to improve security". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Gemalto Protiva is most compared with .
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
