Aster Data Map Reduce vs Azure Data Factory comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Teradata Logo
131 views|105 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
8,287 views|6,470 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aster Data Map Reduce and Azure Data Factory based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Warehouse Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ease of uploading data from multiple sources.""The ease of deployment is useful so clients are up and running quickly in comparison to other products.""It's stable and reliable."

More Aster Data Map Reduce Pros →

"It is very modular. It works well. We've used Data Factory and then made calls to libraries outside of Data Factory to do things that it wasn't optimized to do, and it worked really well. It is obviously proprietary in regards to Microsoft created it, but it is pretty easy and direct to bring in outside capabilities into Data Factory.""Its integrability with the rest of the activities on Azure is most valuable.""Azure Data Factory became more user-friendly when data-flows were introduced.""From what we have seen so far, the solution seems very stable.""The most valuable feature of this solution would be ease of use.""The security of the agent that is installed on-premises is very good.""The data copy template is a valuable feature.""It's cloud-based, allowing multiple users to easily access the solution from the office or remote locations. I like that we can set up the security protocols for IP addresses, like allow lists. It's a pretty user-friendly product as well. The interface and build environment where you create pipelines are easy to use. It's straightforward to manage the digital transformation pipelines we build."

More Azure Data Factory Pros →

Cons
"It is hard for some of our users to set up rules for cleansing and transforming data, so this is something that could be improved.""There are some ways that the handling of unstructured data could be improved.""From my perspective, it would be good if they gave better ITIN/R plugins to use the data for AI modeling, or data science modeling. We can do it now; however, it could be more elegant in terms of interfacing."

More Aster Data Map Reduce Cons →

"A room for improvement in Azure Data Factory is its speed. Parallelization also needs improvement.""Azure Data Factory could benefit from improvements in its monitoring capabilities to provide a more robust feature set. Enhancing the ease of deployment to higher environments within Azure DevOps would be beneficial, as the current process often requires extensive scripting and pipeline development. It is also known for the flexibility of the data flow feature, particularly in supporting more dynamic data-driven architectures. These enhancements would contribute to a more seamless and efficient workflow within GitLab.""Integration of data lineage would be a nice feature in terms of DevOps integration. It would make implementation for a company much easier. I'm not sure if that's already available or not. However, that would be a great feature to add if it isn't already there.""For some of the data, there were some issues with data mapping. Some of the error messages were a little bit foggy. There could be more of a quick start guide or some inline examples. The documentation could be better.""Some known bugs and issues with Azure Data Factory could be rectified.""Areas for improvement in Azure Data Factory include connectivity and integration. When you use integration runtime, whenever there's a failure, the backup process in Azure Data Factory takes time, so this is another area for improvement.""Lacks in-built streaming data processing.""The solution can be improved by decreasing the warmup time which currently can take up to five minutes."

More Azure Data Factory Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product cost is high for what the client gets. There may be more cost-effective solutions for small and medium-sized organizations."
  • More Aster Data Map Reduce Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal."
  • "This is a cost-effective solution."
  • "The price you pay is determined by how much you use it."
  • "Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."
  • "I would not say that this product is overly expensive."
  • "The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."
  • "The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."
  • More Azure Data Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's moderately priced. It's not cheap. I'd rate it 2.5 out of five in terms of affordability.
    Top Answer:Some of our clients are looking for on-premise installations as well. Although we don't have any, some of our prospects are also asking, and we are not sure if that part is easily doable or is as… more »
    Top Answer:AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up and… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power… more »
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    131
    Comparisons
    105
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    525
    Rating
    7.0
    3rd
    Views
    8,287
    Comparisons
    6,470
    Reviews
    46
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    SQL-MapReduce is a framework created by Teradata Aster to allow developers to write powerful and highly expressive SQL-MapReduce functions in languages such as Java, C#, Python, C++, and R and push them into the discovery platform for high performance analytics. Analysts can then invoke SQL-MapReduce functions using standard SQL or R through Aster Database, the first discovery platform that allows applications to be fully embedded within the database engine to enable ultra-fast, deep analysis of massive data sets.

    Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

    Sample Customers
    Volvo, eBay, P&G, Verizon, 7Eleven, ABN Amro, Alior Bank, BBVA, Cabela's, Dell, DHL, Gortz, Homebase, IHG
    1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Insurance Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Data Warehouse
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aster Data Map Reduce is ranked 19th in Data Warehouse with 3 reviews while Azure Data Factory is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 81 reviews. Aster Data Map Reduce is rated 7.4, while Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aster Data Map Reduce writes "Has good base product functionality of data storage and analytics but there should be an option to use it on the cloud ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". Aster Data Map Reduce is most compared with , whereas Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.