Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apica  Logo
904 views|550 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Cavisson Logo
326 views|172 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apica and Cavisson NetStorm based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations.""It is easy to set up and configure.""As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does.""What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers.""With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing.""You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically.""It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica.""Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

More Apica Pros →

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way.""NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage.""This tool helps to focus on real-time transactions that occur at a very high rate."

More Cavisson NetStorm Pros →

Cons
"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have.""Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow.""The accuracy of alerts can be improved a little bit. Right now, it's pretty good in terms of alerting pretty quickly about failures or changes in response times. However, what we have seen happen is the number of alerts that we are getting is very frequent, and we would like to tone down the number of alerts. That's the only trouble we have. Apica could tone down those settings because there is no option for us to tone it down to a level that would reduce the alerts to a minimum. As a platform, it does send us good alerts, but it could be improved a bit.""The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into.""We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections.""The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them.""Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns.""We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

More Apica Cons →

"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs.""In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing.""Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

More Cavisson NetStorm Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."
  • "Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."
  • "The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."
  • "License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."
  • "The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
  • "Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."
  • "The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."
  • "The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
  • More Apica Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "NetStorm is priced well when compared to many well-known tools."
  • More Cavisson NetStorm Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    904
    Comparisons
    550
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    7.8
    19th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    326
    Comparisons
    172
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Datadog logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    AppDynamics logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Apache JMeter logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    OpenText LoadRunner Cloud logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
    Learn More
    Cavisson
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Apica offers a unified perspective on the entire technology stack, encompassing logs, metrics, traces, and APIs. This operational data fabric facilitates quick identification and resolution of performance issues throughout an enterprise's infrastructure. The platform's user-friendly features, including a drag-and-drop interface for dashboards and seamless integrations with tools like Prometheus and Elasticsearch, enhance ease of use and management. Apica's active observability swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform's advanced data management centralizes observability data, simplifying storage, search, and analysis, thereby unveiling valuable insights and patterns. Apica also ensures compliance and governance, providing audit trails to help enterprises meet regulatory requirements. Whether for enterprises of all sizes or those with intricate distributed systems, Apica emerges as a robust tool to elevate technology stack observability and performance.

    Cavisson NetStorm is a powerful load testing solution that is designed to enable application developers to greatly improve the way their applications function. It employs advanced software that enables it to perform many different tasks. This flexibility gives administrators the ability to test their applications in the way that best meets their needs. Cavisson NetStorm offers users the ability to scale their testing environments. These aspects of the solution are only a couple of the reasons that this platform is the load testing tool of choice of several fortune 100 corporations.

    Cavisson NetStorm Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Cavisson NetStorm include:

    • Cost-effectiveness. Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective solution that is well worth the price. The wealth of features and the sort of tasks that Cavisson NetStorm can be employed to accomplish make it possible for organizations to create products that perform at peak effectiveness. It starts with a free trial that becomes a quote-based price.
    • Ease of use. Cavisson NetStorm is intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. Its design saves developers time and makes organizations more productive.
    • High level of stability. Cavisson NetStorm users don’t need to be concerned that it will crash or suffer other performance-related issues when it handles large test loads. It is extremely stable and can easily handle heavy workloads without suffering from an outage. Administrators can let the solution do its work while maintaining peace of mind.
    • Gain deep insights into application behaviors. Administrators can leverage Cavisson NetStorm’s monitoring features to observe many different aspects of the application testing process. One such aspect is the way that the applications behave when they are exposed to certain environment types. Users can obtain in-depth insights as the tests run that will help them understand how their applications function in specific situations.

    Cavisson NetStorm Features

    Some of the many useful features Cavisson NetStorm has to offer include:

    • Diagnostic alert capabilities. Cavisson NetStorm allows users to create diagnostic warnings prior to the commencement of testing. These alerts warn users when deviations from their pre-set testing parameters are taking place. If the application is behaving in a way that is abnormal, these alerts will make sure that administrators are aware of what is going on.
    • Test result reporting tools. Cavisson NetStorm offers administrators the ability to create test result reports that can clearly lay out information belonging to a number of different categories. It has prefabricated reporting templates that enable users to illustrate the kinds of information that is most important to them.
    • Testing dashboards. Cavisson NetStorm comes with a central dashboard that can visually lay out various testing metrics for administrators to view. It also includes dashboards that enable users to view technical or business-related data exclusively.
    • Performance analysis. Cavisson NetStorm can analyze how specific components of the application are impacting its overall performance. If there is any portion that is negatively impacting its performance, Cavisson NetStorm’s analytical tools will find them so that administrators can remedy the problem.
    Sample Customers
    HBO
    Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Hospitality Company17%
    Insurance Company17%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm41%
    Insurance Company10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Media Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Retailer28%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise81%
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise85%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apica is ranked 45th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews while Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 19th in Load Testing Tools. Apica is rated 8.4, while Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Apica writes "Offers transcript download feature and easy to set up and configure tests but not very user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". Apica is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Apache JMeter.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.