We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and AtScale Adaptive Analytics (A3) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop."I feel the streaming is its best feature."
"Apache Spark can do large volume interactive data analysis."
"Spark helps us reduce startup time for our customers and gives a very high ROI in the medium term."
"We use it for ETL purposes as well as for implementing the full transformation pipelines."
"Spark can handle small to huge data and is suitable for any size of company."
"DataFrame: Spark SQL gives the leverage to create applications more easily and with less coding effort."
"The scalability has been the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the Fault Tolerance and easy binding with other processes like Machine Learning, graph analytics."
"The GUI interface is nice and easy to use."
"Apache Spark is very difficult to use. It would require a data engineer. It is not available for every engineer today because they need to understand the different concepts of Spark, which is very, very difficult and it is not easy to learn."
"The management tools could use improvement. Some of the debugging tools need some work as well. They need to be more descriptive."
"At times during the deployment process, the tool goes down, making it look less robust. To take care of the issues in the deployment process, users need to do manual interventions occasionally."
"If you have a Spark session in the background, sometimes it's very hard to kill these sessions because of D allocation."
"Apache Spark could improve the connectors that it supports. There are a lot of open-source databases in the market. For example, cloud databases, such as Redshift, Snowflake, and Synapse. Apache Spark should have connectors present to connect to these databases. There are a lot of workarounds required to connect to those databases, but it should have inbuilt connectors."
"When you are working with large, complex tasks, the garbage collection process is slow and affects performance."
"Apache Spark provides very good performance The tuning phase is still tricky."
"Apache Spark could potentially improve in terms of user-friendliness, particularly for individuals with a SQL background. While it's suitable for those with programming knowledge, making it more accessible to those without extensive programming skills could be beneficial."
"The product was not able to meet our 10 second refresh requirements."
"The organization of the icons is not saved across users."
"There was an issue with the incremental aggregation not working as indicated."
Earn 20 points
Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while AtScale Adaptive Analytics (A3) is ranked 5th in Data Virtualization. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while AtScale Adaptive Analytics (A3) is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AtScale Adaptive Analytics (A3) writes "The GUI interface is nice and easy to use, but the organization of the icons is not saved across users". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas AtScale Adaptive Analytics (A3) is most compared with Denodo, Dremio, ThoughtSpot, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform and Alation Data Catalog.
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.