Amazon Aurora vs Exasol comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,771 views|4,259 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Exasol Logo
601 views|362 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Aurora and Exasol based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Exasol Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature.""The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora is SQL standardization, it doesn't have its own syntax which is good. It has a lot of hands-off self-management type of activities, such as log rolling and auto-scaling.""We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities.""The most valuable feature is that the maintainability is offloaded to the service provider. I don't have to maintain a database or do any administrative tasks, which comes in handy.""The most valuable feature is the ability to do multiple-read and single-write. These are the kinds of features that we were interested in, and Aurora takes care of that natively.""Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.""The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."

More Amazon Aurora Pros →

"Its speed is great.""It is easy to scale.""We mainly chose Exasol for its performance reasons.""Performance is a top priority, and it excels in this aspect.""The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed.""We can quickly scale the solution as it works on an MPP system.""The speed is very good compared to other databases, like SQL Server or Oracle.""The solution is hands-off; you set it up insert your data and it self tunes queries."

More Exasol Pros →

Cons
"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers.""The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement.""I would like to see performance insights on the database based on the queries. Currently, we use SolarWinds as the monitoring tool. I would like to leverage SolarWinds’ performance insights in AWS services. SolarWinds gives larger insights when we run performance issues.""It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that.""There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired.""The pricing could improve. It should be reduced.""I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

More Amazon Aurora Cons →

"You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems.""There are limited resources available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol.""The only area where we found it could improve was in custom role creation and security, and it was difficult to work with.""They should improve the security features for MPP processing.""Lacks a cloud-based platform.""It would be beneficial if the updates would occur more often.""It's not cloud-native so many maintenance operations require downtime.""They don't talk very well to with other products when it comes to connectivity. Integration is lacking."

More Exasol Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be lower compared to its competitors."
  • "It is quite expensive."
  • "The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."
  • "It is an expensive solution."
  • "There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."
  • "I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."
  • More Amazon Aurora Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged."
  • More Exasol Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in pricing. I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed.
    Top Answer:You have to use upper-column names in Exasol, which is strange. You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems.
    Top Answer:We implemented our data problem issues from Tableau. We inserted the data into the Exasol database in order to run 10 to 20 reports from Tableau. This was just a small but problematic report for us.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,771
    Comparisons
    4,259
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    601
    Comparisons
    362
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 33% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    SAP HANA logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Vertica logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Oracle Database In-Memory logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    MySQL logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

    Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

    Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

    Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

    Exasol is a high-performance data warehouse solution that accelerates BI and reporting features. Its speed, stability, and self-tuning queries make it valuable, and it doesn't require a database administrator. It's a backend database for Tableau dashboards, resulting in faster report loading times and increased efficiency in querying data. 

    Exasol's high performance allows users to connect insights and fire queries instead of looking at cached dashboards. It has impressive aggregation capabilities that help calculate metrics on the fly based on user-selected filters.

    Sample Customers
    Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel
    1&1 Internet SE 11880 Internet Services AG AB Svenska Spel Accarda AG Aera Technology Inc. AGRAVIS Raiffeisen AG Apotheken-Rechen-Zentrum GmbH AQR Capital Management, LLC arvato distribution GmbH ARZ Allgemeines Rechenzentrum GmbH Badoo Limited Baur Versand (GmbH & Co. KG) BIScience Ltd Blocket Blue Yonder GmbH Codilink UK Ltd T/A Coniq crealytics GmbH dailyme TV GmbH Dailymotion S.A. Dataforce Verlagsgesellschaft für Business Information mbH Deutsche Postbank AG Digitales Rezept Zentrum GmbH DIKW Groep direct services Gütersloh GmbH DR Technologies Ltd. dress-for-less GmbH econda GmbH emetriq GmbH empiriecom GmbH & Co. KG Flaconi GmbH Fresenius Netcare GmbH Fyber GmbH GfK SE Grant Street Group, Inc. Gruner + Jahr GmbH Gymshark UK Hahn Air Lines GmbH Hermes Einrichtungs Service GmbH & Co. KG INNOVATIVE SCHEDULING, LLC internetstores GmbH INTERSPORT Deutschland eG IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG IQVIA Commercial Sp. z o.o. IQVIA Incorporated iVantage Health Analytics K - Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG LIQ CORP SA Manor AG Basel Match2Lists Limited MEDION AG Midasplayer AB Monsoon Accessorize Limited m-pathy GmbH msales Ltd. MTG Modern Services AB MW Aviation GmbH & Co. KG Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd Netzeffekt GmbH New Company Services Ltd. NOVENTI HealthCare GmbH Olympus Europa SE & Co. KG Operation Fistula OpsDataStore OTTO (GmbH & Co KG) Panda Retail Co. PAPSTAR GmbH Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. Questback GmbH RatePAY GmbH Revolut Ltd. Saarland-Sporttoto GmbH Sagarmatha Ltd. SIA Damara Technologies Supermärkte Nord Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG The National Research Center for College & University Admissions, Inc. United Utilities Water Ltd. Verlag C.H. Beck oHG Vocal Planet Ltd. Vodafone Group Services GmbH Webtrekk GmbH wer liefert was? GmbH Windeln.de SE Wooga GmbH XING SE Zalando SE
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Retailer14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise76%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon Aurora vs. Exasol
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Exasol and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,346 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Aurora is ranked 11th in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while Exasol is ranked 12th in Relational Databases Tools with 8 reviews. Amazon Aurora is rated 7.8, while Exasol is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Aurora writes "Easy-to-manage platform with a valuable auto-scaling feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Exasol writes "Fast query processing and easy-to-store all the data". Amazon Aurora is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MariaDB, CockroachDB and MySQL, whereas Exasol is most compared with SQL Server, SAP HANA, Vertica, Oracle Database In-Memory and MySQL. See our Amazon Aurora vs. Exasol report.

    See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.