We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and Mendix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"Enables us to rapidly create a complex application. We are also able to customize features that stakeholders in the corporation want to see, something that could not be done with other software. Our workflows and processes have evolved and improved. The fast iterations allow us to be nimble, get feedback from users, and do rapid updates."
"The initial setup is easy."
"You can scale the solution."
"The most valuable features are the decorative style, model-driven development, and the fact that Mendix validates flows. Mendix is quick to develop because it's a low-code platform. It's very robust, flexible, open, and scalable. It's for a low-code customer. The tooling is also really good and it has mobile capabilities."
"The user experience is great."
"I find the fast development speed and low cost to be very valuable features of Mendix. It's a smart solution for busy developers when we need to apply new changes or fixes quickly. Mendix helps to save time and meet project deadlines faster."
"There is a free version of the solution you can use."
"It is low code, where the developers can still develop in Java. That to us is very appealing."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"There needs to be an increase in the number of the UI components."
"What is lacking is the support of higher level modeling features, like the modeling you do is relatively low level, yet it is still close to programming. We would like to see a more business-oriented modeling environment, like BPMN."
"My understanding is that, if you are not using the free version, it is very expensive."
"There are not enough developers who are using Mendix. The knowledge base available online and in the market is not as rich as other competitors."
"While the community is great, they need to work on making their direct technical support services better."
"There should be more integration with engineering applications and tighter integration for user authentication, such as single sign-on, etc. They have some of that. It just could be stronger."
"We'd like to be able to write in C Sharp to develop code for Mendix."
"Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Mendix is ranked 2nd in Mobile Development Platforms with 48 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Mendix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mendix writes "Low-code, helpful support, and great native mobile capability". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mendix is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Appian, Oracle Application Express (APEX) and ServiceNow.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.