We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its ease of use. If you have had some experience with other solutions, such as Snowflake, the use of this solution will be simple."
"It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good."
"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services."
"The tool's middle-dimensional structure significantly simplifies obtaining the right data at the appropriate level. This feature makes deploying our applications easier since we utilize a single source without publishing data from various sources."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its user-friendly graphical interface."
"The new version with the Productivity Cloud is very simple. It's easy to use, navigate, and understand."
"It can scale to a great extent. It can handle the load that we are putting on it, which is about 5TBs."
"The product has a good user interface."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"The tool's lineage is very weak."
"To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful."
"When using the SQL loader type there were not a lot of pre-processing features for the data. For example, if there is a table with twenty columns, but we only want to load ten columns. In that case, we can use a security script to select the specific columns needed. However, if we want to perform extensive pre-processing of the data, I faced some challenges with Matillion ETL. I did not encounter many challenges, but my overall experience is limited as I only have three years of experience."
"There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."
"Going forward, I would like them to add custom jobs, since we still have to run these outside of Matillion."
"The cost of the solution is high and could be reduced."
"Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes simultaneously at the entry level."
"Ideally, I would like it to integrate with Secrets Manager as well as the AWS."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 28th in Data Integration with 2 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "High performance and flexible solution for companies with large amounts of data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, AWS Glue, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Data Management Platform, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS. See our Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. Matillion ETL report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
