Share your experience using Affirmed Networks [EOL]

I primarily use VMware NSX for improving security through micro-segmentation of our network. We have strict security regulations that require us to segregate different subnets, and NSX helps us efficiently manage this.

I value the ability to dynamically configure our network on the fly using VMware NSX. This flexibility is a huge advantage because it allows us to avoid static configurations that come with traditional hardware setups. 

Additionally, the micro-segmentation feature is beneficial for adhering to strict security regulations from our security department.

The initial configuration and integration within our existing environment were not easy. The configuration process was a bit complex, specifically during the initial setup.

I have been working with VMware NSX for about two years.

I would rate the stability of the product at eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability as ten out of ten. There is a high level of satisfaction with its ability to scale.

The initial setup was not easy, and it involved challenges with integration within our existing environment.

The cost of VMware NSX is considered high. I would rate the price at two or three out of ten. It could be cheaper.

I am familiar with a competing product from Akamai. We performed a number of tests with it during due diligence but did not move to production due to its client-side agent setup being unacceptable by our security department.

I would rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. 

I recommend VMware NSX, depending on the organization's environment. It is often suitable for enterprise-level companies due to deployment complexity and cost considerations.

We are using Cisco ACI primarily for data center operations. We are creating different remote channels for segmentation and structuring our network, building routes for traffic management, and implementing micro-segmentation from end-to-end for traffic management.

Robustness is a key aspect. Stability and robustness are what we are banking on. It is essential for growing our data center connectivity and enablement for our customers. It is a must for us. The routing of traffic is one of our main focuses when utilizing Cisco ACI.

We are looking at better synchronization with the cloud and on-premise, bringing in a multi-cloud networking solution. It can be simplified. We need more APIs to capture logs, offer next-level insights for debugging, and performance-based packet tracking. Additionally, some sustainability measures or emissions tracking features would be beneficial.

My team has been working with Cisco ACI for five to six years.

Stability is one of the highlights, contributing to the robustness of the solution.

The scalability of Cisco ACI supports our organization's growth effectively. It is scalable and provides essential support as we grow our data center connectivity.

Initially, we faced challenges in getting technical support. Currently, we have no issues. The technical support from Cisco is satisfactory.

Positive

We have experience working with other SD-WAN solutions, such as Cisco Viptela, Meraki, Aruba Central, and Juniper, at the SD-WAN level yet not at the data center level. We use NSX for another customer, however, it is not at the scale of Cisco ACI.

The initial setup was not straightforward. We adopted an agile strategy, starting small and expanding to multiple data centers. The deployment took approximately eighteen months.

We engaged Cisco for professional services during the initial stages, and we collaborated closely with their team to address challenges.

Efficient utilization leads to cost savings and efficiency gains. We achieved ROI within approximately 30 to 35 months, and it has been essential for us.

We have used SD-WAN solutions like Cisco Viptela, Meraki, Aruba Central, and Juniper. Additionally, we work with NSX for another customer.

I recommend Cisco ACI due to its reliable tech support, timely updates for security, traffic management, and ease of management. Enhancements with public APIs and sustainability measures could be beneficial. 

Overall, I rate the solution as nine on a scale of one to ten.