Share your experience using Symphony

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 84,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Group Information Technology Manager at Promoseven Holdings
Real User
Top 10
A cloud-based point of sale system that can be used for creating menus, bills, and user IDs
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
  • "The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

It is a cloud-based point of sale (POS) system for making bills, creating menus, creating user IDs, training how to use the system, punching in the order, and making invoice bills.

What is most valuable?

The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise. If you have bulk menus, it's easy to make bulk updates in the system.

What needs improvement?

The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved. The training sessions have to be more specific. It would be great if we could make a training module in the system to train new employees in an offline version. We can have a training session to train a new person to check in, check out, do the billing, and do the PMS reporting.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Symphony for more than 12 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Since it is a cloud-based system, we sometimes face issues with the system connectivity from the cloud side. It doesn't happen often, and the support team solves the issue whenever it occurs.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Around 15 users use the solution on one property, and around 30 users use it on another property.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support could be improved. If you have a good relationship with the support team, you can call them, and they will provide support at the same number. Otherwise, you have to create a ticket and wait around eight hours. If it's a critical issue, they will call in one hour.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

What about the implementation team?

Usually, if we have an old system, it will take time to migrate the old data to the new database. If it is a completely new property from scratch, it takes around a week to deploy everything, check the requirements, and set up the solution.

What other advice do I have?

Simphony is a cloud-based solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Nenad Pejcic - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Professional Services Engineer at Aspire Technology
Real User
Top 20
Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier
Pros and Cons
  • "I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
  • "Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."

What is our primary use case?

In my job, Symphony software, especially the Rand Commander tool, was crucial for planning and optimizing networks. With Rand Commander, I could see where network elements were located, their configurations, and details like sectors and radio planning. I used the item tool to generate IP addresses based on specific rules, and the Name Manager for SQN assignments. Symphony's cloud models, particularly the open ones, made tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier for me.

How has it helped my organization?

The biggest benefit I have seen from using Symphony, especially in terms of automation, stands out. Specifically, in running automation tasks, like during special events in the open run solution, numerous nodes get involved in network designation, requiring extensive integration and precise planning. Doing this manually is not only time-consuming but prone to errors. Symphony, through its automation support, enables the creation of templates. These templates streamline the generation of all necessary data inputs, making planning for integrated network elements and interfaces much quicker and error-free.

What is most valuable?

I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable. It provided a detailed and efficient overview of the network, simplifying tasks related to planning and optimization.

What needs improvement?

One area for improvement would be product maturity. Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module. The constraint of not being able to easily modify dashboards or templates hinders user adaptability. A more user-friendly and customizable approach, similar to platforms like Apple, would enhance the overall user experience with Symphony. One feature I felt was missing in Symphony was a module for scheduling performance reports. While it may be part of the current portfolio, not having it at that time was a limitation. I see this as a valuable enhancement.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Symphony has been stable overall. Being web-based, it works well on any browser. However, there were occasional issues, primarily related to the tool's stability during periods of improvement and maintenance. These instances led to temporary unavailability of the product.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have experience with solutions from other vendors like Nokia, Huawei, and Tyson. The main pros of Symphony, in comparison, are the modules that provide a comprehensive overview and the automation features for planning data. These aspects are notably beneficial and stand out. On the downside, the major cons revolve around user customization. Unlike other vendors where you can create your reports and customize navigation, Symphony's user optimization in the SCAP module is limited. This lack of flexibility is a significant drawback, especially when compared to other solutions. Overall, while certain modules like those related to SolarWinds are straightforward and comparable, Symphony falls short in terms of user customization.

How was the initial setup?

I helped with the deployment of Symphony as on-site support, focusing on tools like SAP inventory and the VM module for defining KPIs. I wasn't part of the initial deployment, but when I joined, basic functionalities were still being developed. Tasks like migrating from testing to production took less than two weeks, but ongoing development and testing were time-consuming.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Symphony, especially if you are involved in optimizing day-to-day work, particularly in OpenRAN network deployment. It can significantly streamline tasks and offer modules not found in traditional vendors. It is a valuable tool for those looking to implement efficient network solutions. Overall, I would rate Symphony as a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate