Share your experience using Trellix Intrusion Prevention System - Virtual

My main use case for Splunk User Behavior Analytics is to provide user behavior analytics, where we have users accessing very critical servers and services, including databases and very critical information, allowing me to implement Splunk User Behavior Analytics to detect abnormal behavior from users.

A quick specific example of how Splunk User Behavior Analytics helped me detect abnormal behavior is when we integrated with Active Directory to always monitor user behavior. If we suddenly discovered high traffic usage for a user, we could stop that user from Active Directory and create an incident based on this.

I always have day-to-day operations on the dashboard for Splunk User Behavior Analytics, which helps me gain insight into user activity. Whatever abnormal traffic from a user appears, we can stop it.

The best features Splunk User Behavior Analytics offers are usability and stability, and the licensing model is excellent.

Usability stands out for me because I can get very critical insights into user activity from the dashboard. Stability means the product is reliable, and every upgrade is completed successfully with a straightforward licensing model featuring various types of options.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics positively impacts my organization by providing deep visibility into user behavior, allowing us to protect our data from abnormal users and ensuring everything is monitored to secure our data.

I believe Splunk User Behavior Analytics can be improved by enhancing support. I have only reached support once, and they require more information to engage with critical cases, so improving support is a vital feature.

The customer support needs improvement.

I have been using Splunk User Behavior Analytics for six months.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is stable.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is scalable and excellent in terms of scalability.

The customer support needs improvement.

I did not previously use a different solution.

I have seen a return on investment. All of this has already happened after implementing Splunk User Behavior Analytics.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was excellent. The pricing and setup cost, along with the licensing model, is outstanding.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Splunk User Behavior Analytics.

I recommend that users or technical buyers get deeply familiar with the documentation from Splunk before implementing Splunk User Behavior Analytics, as that will be very useful to them. I gave this review a rating of ten.

I can see that I am a consultant at a reseller and I am the architect of Cato SASE Cloud Platform designs. In the baseline, I usually recommend Cato SASE Cloud Platform for international companies that have many different setups spread globally.

I think all of the functionalities, such as the secure web gateway feature, are quite good. I also believe Cato SASE Cloud Platform is one of the only solutions that has not only a software firewall solution but also a physical software solution where you can change the company's firewalls and put in sockets from Cato SASE Cloud Platform, which I see as an advantage for them.

The single-pass architecture has improved user experience with Cato SASE Cloud Platform as it provides security teams in companies a platform where they can easily obtain information if there are breaches or security issues.

I assess the benefit of integrating WAN optimization as good. There is ease in making rules between WAN optimization, especially when it comes to global connections because of all their points of presence that are spread over the world.

I think the real-time threat protection of Cato SASE Cloud Platform is also good. Their points of presence are quite efficient, and I do not see any delays in that area.

To improve Cato SASE Cloud Platform, I think they sometimes need more built-in features for security in larger networks when doing local authentication, as they currently leave that to other vendors.

I would have preferred to see more LT 5G connection built into their sockets in the future, which is coming up now and I think that is positive.

I am quite familiar with Cato SASE Cloud Platform networks and I have been working with Cato SASE Cloud Platform for two to three years.

I find Cato SASE Cloud Platform overall stable.

I think the technical support by Cato SASE Cloud Platform is quite good and I would rate their performance an eight out of ten for that area.

Positive

I do not find it particularly expensive, but for some companies, they may not have the budget to be at that level of security for their networks.

If Cato SASE Cloud Platform does not fit the budget, I usually recommend a more on-site solution, such as FortiGate firewalls, or if they would prefer a cloud solution, I would suggest a full Meraki solution with MX Gateways from Meraki.

It is difficult to find types of companies I would not recommend Cato SASE Cloud Platform to, and I believe you can use Cato SASE Cloud Platform in most environments, although there could be some cases where organizations are really cost-sensitive.

I measure the effectiveness of Cato SASE Cloud Platform using metrics such as milliseconds for connections and bandwidth, comparing it with its efficiency to see if it delivers on their bandwidth choices.

I believe that the centralized cloud-native management helps with policy configuration by allowing users to build their own environment without many issues, which is key to going cloud-based. I would rate this review an overall eight out of ten.