Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using Recovery Manager for Active Directory

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 102,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Nick Hairapetian - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Expert II TEC05 - Technical Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10Leaderboard
Sep 23, 2024
Good automation and worth the money with helpful disaster recovery
Pros and Cons
  • "The feature that automates most of the tasks is the most valuable since you do not have to worry about making sure that you follow the steps one by one manually during a disaster."
  • "One of the things they can do is give the user the ability to skip the prechecks and verifications."

What is our primary use case?

We use Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory to test disaster recovery, and we use it to restore objects as they get deleted by mistake or mistakes happen.

What is most valuable?

The feature that automates most of the tasks is the most valuable since you do not have to worry about making sure that you follow the steps one by one manually during a disaster. Basically, automation is the key player.

What needs improvement?

One of the things they can do is give the user the ability to skip the prechecks and verifications.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for 18 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable. The only complaint I have is the price of the product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's scalable. You can easily scale up or down.

How are customer service and support?

Most of the time, their support is pretty good. Sometimes, it could be better.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup requires a design and engineering phase. You can't just pick the product and click next, next, finish - especially if you're planning on making sure that it's going to be available during a disaster. It does require sitting down and designing it. So it's not like a home-use product that you can just go and install and start using it with no consequence.

What was our ROI?

Right now, it is worth the money because even if we save ourselves from one ransomware attack, it will pay for itself within the first couple of hours.

What other advice do I have?

Be willing to pay the extra money. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Operations Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
May 9, 2024
Offers zero-touch or zero-intervention aspects, stable and easy to setup
Pros and Cons
  • "I like the zero-touch or zero-intervention aspect the most when it comes to performing a forest restoration (FOHO). It is really automated. If you set everything correctly, it will restore your forest without any manual steps."
  • "Inside the console, when you change something in the computer collection, there's no history or log showing what's been done. For example, if I add or remove a domain controller from the compare collection, the console doesn't record the time or the user who made the change. This makes it difficult to manage the console, especially for auditing purposes. It lacks login capability within Recovery Manager for Active Directory."

What is our primary use case?

I use it to recover user objects or any objects within Active Directory, as well as to recover domain controllers, domains, and forests.

How has it helped my organization?

The backup automation has enhanced my IT workflow by reducing the amount of manual monitoring needed. 

While backup automation itself isn't new, Quest Recovery Manager sends emails to let me know if a backup is successful and checks its integrity. 

It also notifies me if cloud backups are completed – that's a relatively new feature in the latest version, 10.3.1.

What is most valuable?

I like the zero-touch or zero-intervention aspect the most when it comes to performing a forest restoration (FOHO). It is really automated. If you set everything correctly, it will restore your forest without any manual steps.

It gives us a good idea of our RTO and RPO – how long it would take to recover our entire forest or a single domain controller in a disaster scenario. So, for me, in terms of potential, I'd scale it a nine out of ten.

What needs improvement?

Inside the console, when you change something in the computer collection, there's no history or log showing what's been done. For example, if I add or remove a domain controller from the compare collection, the console doesn't record the time or the user who made the change. This makes it difficult to manage the console, especially for auditing purposes. It lacks login capability within Recovery Manager for Active Directory.

This means if I delegate tasks to a level two or an interim level three technician, and they make a mistake, it's difficult to track. Ideally, I'd like to monitor who makes changes within the console to ensure proper management. Currently, that kind of capability isn't available.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using it since 2020. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a very stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. No issues here. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. When you have more than a hundred compare collections inside your console, and each compare collection has an average of two or three domain controllers, the console will not respond in a fast manner and can become slow. 

It has difficulty managing that volume, so I often use the PowerShell module for Quest Recovery Manager instead.

For now, we only have six users, and I'm the only one actively using it right now.

How are customer service and support?

The customer service and support could improve their approach to questioning issues. They tend to ask questions one at a time, which creates a lot of back-and-forth communication. 

It would be helpful if they had checklists for common issues customers encounter, as it could speed up the resolution process. Asking questions back and forth via email isn't always the most efficient way to resolve issues quickly.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used Semperis and native backup and recovery solutions by Microsoft.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very easy, honestly. You just have to follow the user guide that they have.

As long as you follow the instructions in the user guide, you should be able to set up and perform your initial configuration inside the console.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is in the middle. Comparing it to other vendors, it seems to be affordable. So, it is worth the money. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Quest Recovery Manager to others. If someone is looking for an end-to-end backup and disaster recovery solution specifically for Active Directory, Quest is the only tool that currently offers bare metal restore capability.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.