Share your experience using KeyCloud Storage as a Service

We use the solution to share documents across teams and store them long-term in locations independent of a laptop.

With Google Drive Enterprise, multiple people can edit a document, and you can open it as Google Docs. You don't need a reader because the format reader is already a part of the drive or the browser. The ecosystem has become very user-friendly, and we don't need to purchase any software.

Google Drive Enterprise could be made more user-friendly.

I have been using Google Drive Enterprise for a few years.

Google Drive Enterprise is a very stable solution.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for stability.

I have previously used Dropbox.

The solution provided us with good productivity, knowledge management, and knowledge sharing.

No setup is required for the solution, as it's all on the browser. Google Drive Enterprise is beneficial for anything that has to be shared across teams, where multiple people need to work on a document. The solution's security features are very good. We can define who gets access to the document. Users need to define their access properly so that they don't modify someone else's document. It is a good knowledge management tool.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the tool for authentication across all customers and save data. It also helps us to monitor servers. 

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability. 

Azure NetApp Files is expensive. 

I have been working with the product for eight years. 

I rate Azure NetApp Files' stability an eight out of ten. 

The tool is scalable. They offer three different sizes for backup purposes, and if a disk is available, you can retrieve data from it immediately.

I have only experienced the best performance from Azure NetApp Files and have never faced any performance issues with the product. 

Before choosing Azure NetApp Files, I used a different setup to mount a single disk and share it across multiple servers. This approach often led to connectivity issues and network glitches, especially when there were problems with the network switches.

Azure NetApp Files' deployment is easy. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. Customers want high availability without interruptions. If you're looking for a reliable service where your environment stays stable and accessible at all times, I'd recommend going with Azure NetApp Files. From my experience of several migrations, I've found it to be a dependable solution that ensures continuous availability without interruptions.