Share your experience using HGST Device Manager [EOL]

We are still working with SolarWinds and use the NPM product along with SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor.

The technical details and features that can be retrieved from each product have been found most valuable. The performance metrics, especially for CPU and memory, and for the overall performance of the servers have been found most valuable. Its ability to identify storage hotspots assists with troubleshooting. We utilize SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor's reporting features, which have helped with strategic storage planning.

The number of similar alerts is the main area for improvement. Alert noise would be great to reduce.

I have been working with SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor for the past four years.

We use customizable alerts extensively with different services, because the exchange services are different from Active Directory or DNS or anything else. We have customizable alerts for each service.

I do not use the historical data trends that predict future storage needs. Perhaps some of my colleagues use it, but I do not.

I would like to see a focus on broadcast services in the future to make it better. Broadcast services, specifically TV broadcast services, would be valuable to us because we come from a broadcast technology background and would appreciate having some features related to that.

I would rate this review as an eight out of ten.

StorageMAP serves as my main data storage solution. A specific example of how I use StorageMAP to restore data involves storing third-party vendor data, using it as a data warehouse, and then pulling the data for our customer campaigns.

StorageMAP's efficiency and latency are the best features it offers. Its efficiency and latency have helped me significantly since my application needs to get the response as quickly as possible, and StorageMAP has been very helpful in that regard.

StorageMAP has impacted my organization positively. The positive impact includes that it has saved my team time, reduced costs, and improved performance.

StorageMAP can be improved by doing a better job on the user interface.

I have been using StorageMAP for one year.

StorageMAP is stable.

StorageMAP's scalability is really good.

The customer support is good.

I see a return on investment since I save the data.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good.

My advice to others looking into using StorageMAP is to go for it. I give StorageMAP a rating of 10.