No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Share your experience using CacheFly

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 112,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

reviewer2868081 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jul 4, 2026
Layer 7 protection has strengthened application security and now reduces our first‑year costs
Pros and Cons
  • "I appreciate the UI of F5 Distributed Cloud Services and the backend cost, alongside the actual value proposition that they provide with the load balancer, which is excellent."
  • "One area where F5 Distributed Cloud Services can be improved is in API security, which can be enhanced."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for F5 Distributed Cloud Services is WAF protection.

I am using F5 Distributed Cloud Services primarily for securing my infrastructure with layer 7 protection, which F5 provides. The scenarios and use cases I am protecting involve geo-blocking, rate limiting, and allowing specific traffic to my applications. I have OWASP Top 10 protections enabled, as F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers OWASP Top 10 for layer 7 protections, which provides multiple protection capabilities.

What is most valuable?

I appreciate the UI of F5 Distributed Cloud Services and the backend cost, alongside the actual value proposition that they provide with the load balancer, which is excellent.

In my opinion, the best features F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers include their ability to operate without running on the cloud, which is why they provide good value to Indian customers. This feature benefits my organization by providing overall value and cost with the product. When I say the product is not hosted on the cloud, I mean that the product itself is managed by data centers as most clouds do. However, their seamless management of their own data center and the fact that F5 Distributed Cloud Services holds its own data center is what benefits customers in India.

What needs improvement?

One area where F5 Distributed Cloud Services can be improved is in API security, which can be enhanced.

Specifically, the confidence level on API security that F5 Distributed Cloud Services provides can be improved, especially if they can discover APIs in a better manner than all of their competitors.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using F5 Distributed Cloud Services for approximately three months.

What was our ROI?

I have seen specific outcomes where it has improved security. It has not saved time, but it has reduced costs for the first year at least.

I would estimate the cost was reduced by approximately 30 percent in the first year.

What other advice do I have?

F5 Distributed Cloud Services offers a bundle of use cases which are certainly good for a WAF and API. Regarding F5 Distributed Cloud Services's AI capabilities, I think their governance and security are good. I note that they are working on AI but have not yet released anything; they are combining something from AI and working in the backend, so I would say it is progressing well.

I rate F5 Distributed Cloud Services an eight out of ten overall.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Client
Last updated: Jul 4, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Cloud Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Jun 18, 2026
Caching static content has improved delivery speed and documentation still needs clearer examples
Pros and Cons
  • "Fastly has positively impacted my organization by helping to obtain better solutions in less time and in a much more traceable way."
  • "I think Fastly could improve by improving the documentation and having some code examples so that it is easier for developers, since at the beginning it becomes a bit complicated."

What is our primary use case?

My primary use case for Fastly is using it as a CDN to speed up my customers' access to the applications.

A specific example of how Fastly has helped improve my customers' access to the application is that it caches static content and makes it more quickly accessible to users. Additionally, internally it allows me to evolve through code and not go through configuration with many clicks as I had to do with other alternative products. Here it allows me to integrate it directly into the code.

What is most valuable?

I consider the best features that Fastly offers to be cost and the ability to have it integrated into the code development flow.

I have noticed a significant difference in cost compared to other similar solutions.

Fastly has a wide number of configuration features that can be performed, and I emphasize that they can be done from code, which makes it much more traceable.

Fastly has positively impacted my organization by helping to obtain better solutions in less time and in a much more traceable way. A specific example that reflects that impact is that we have improvements in traceability by having the changes integrated into the Git repositories and having the possibility of doing a rollback in the event of any problem in a very simple way.

What needs improvement?

I think Fastly could improve by improving the documentation and having some code examples so that it is easier for developers, since at the beginning it becomes a bit complicated.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Fastly for a year and a half.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I consider Fastly to be stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the scalability of Fastly as very good.

How are customer service and support?

I would describe Fastly's customer support as fast and efficient when I have had to use it. I rate customer support on a scale from 1 to 10 as eight.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I used CloudFront before Fastly, and I decided to switch because of this product's greater capabilities and lower costs.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment, particularly in time savings, especially regarding the changes.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In terms of price, I find it good, and as I mentioned, the implementation cost had some difficulty at the beginning due to the learning curve.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others who are considering using Fastly is that they evaluate it and not always think of using the native CDN of the cloud they work in. I rate this review as a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 18, 2026
Flag as inappropriate