Share your experience using CacheFly

My main use case for Link11 is to employ artificial intelligence to detect bot-driven attacks cybersecurity-wise, effectively.

A specific example of how I have used Link11 to detect bot-driven attacks is that it has been particularly beneficial for my business because it is a regulated sector, and it helps provide the necessary tools to my team to maintain security and compliance in an increasingly complex digital landscape.

Link11 offers high-performing platform capabilities and automated responses. The system operates on its own cloud infrastructure without requiring my input.

The automated responses have helped my team and my workflow by reacting to threats in real time and helping mitigate attacks within moments instead of relying on manual alerts and manual response processes.

Link11 has positively impacted my organization by helping analyze all incoming traffic continuously, functioning like an employee operating in the background.

This background analysis has affected my organization's security and efficiency in that I do not have to worry about it. It operates on the back end automatically, taking care of things that I do not have to worry about or think about, but I know it is working.

The dashboard is somewhat clunky, which is the primary area I would want Link11 to improve. I wish that it was a little easier on the eyes, as green is a difficult color for me to see.

I have been using Link11 for one year.

Link11 is stable.

I have never tried to scale Link11, but it integrates well with our existing infrastructure.

Link11's customer support is very good, and I have no complaints.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was already discussed before I started with the company. The rollout was very easy and the price was appropriate for our needs. I have no concerns or issues with the setup process.

I have seen a return on investment in that there are definitely fewer employees needed. There is no need to have redundant people when we have a system like Link11 set up in the background.

My main use case for Uplynk is live channels around the clock. Since we're in the television business, we're constantly showcasing shows, and it's a continuous operation.

Uplynk's best features are its stability and its capacity to handle high volumes of traffic. The stability that stands out most to me is the ability to handle traffic spikes, which I would say is the best feature.

Uplynk has positively impacted our organization by bringing us more viewership. It does not glitch and stays stable during spikes in viewership. We've seen approximately a 15 to 20 percent increase in viewership because there's no lag and nothing fails. It's constant, so viewership increased. It allowed our viewers to have trust in what we were providing due to the software.

To improve Uplynk, it should be made more user-friendly, as it takes a lot of moving pieces to make it work. Uplynk is very complex software with many moving pieces. If you're a big company, Uplynk is for you. If you're a small company, consider YouTube Stream and similar software because you're not at the scale yet to be using Uplynk.

I have been using Uplynk for a few years, but my company has been using it for probably ten years.

Uplynk is very stable. Uplynk's scalability is very high and very well scalable.

Uplynk's customer support is amazing, especially when you run into problems. They know everything about their product and they're always willing to support and stay on top of it with you to ensure that you're able to fix the issue at hand.

I wasn't a part of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing discussions, but from what I heard from my colleagues, they said it was really good and it was fair, so they went with that.

Uplynk is deployed in my organization on-premises and is fully on-site.

Uplynk supports our business continuity or disaster recovery plans because it's really well protected and it doesn't lag or crash when there's a spike in all areas. Uplynk helps us comply with regulatory requirements in our industry by keeping us live.

Uplynk integrates really well with other systems or tools we use. You need a whole team to really run Uplynk because there are so many moving pieces, the code, the app, and other components. My experience with Uplynk's analytics or reporting capabilities is that they are especially helpful to update the teams and our stakeholders.

I would describe Uplynk's flexibility or customization options as really easy, really customizable, and it integrates in many areas. Uplynk helps me deliver content to different devices or platforms by allowing us to upload on and stay live on tablets, computers, and televisions. It allows us to stay live to get those viewerships.

Uplynk is a software that saves time, but you need a solid team to run Uplynk to ensure viewership and everything is moving because there are many pieces to keep. I advise others looking into using Uplynk that it takes many different areas: coding, integration, APIs, and all that. It takes a team to run it, and you need to be a big company. If you're streaming and doing all that at a big scale, use it. If you're on a smaller scale, Uplynk is going to be really hard for you to manage. It's not something that's simple; just use the ones that are basic out there if you're an influencer and things like that. I would rate this product a nine overall.